-
Recent Comments
- Scott Pierce on Does Jonathan Edwards Need Paul Tripp?
- Richard Smith on Does Jonathan Edwards Need Paul Tripp?
- Nick Mackison on Does Jonathan Edwards Need Paul Tripp?
- Jack Miller on Faint Resemblance
- Nick Mackison on Does Jonathan Edwards Need Paul Tripp?
- Richard Smith on Does Jonathan Edwards Need Paul Tripp?
- Richard Smith on Does Jonathan Edwards Need Paul Tripp?
- Richard Smith on Does Jonathan Edwards Need Paul Tripp?
- Nick Mackison on Does Jonathan Edwards Need Paul Tripp?
- dsanger on Does Jonathan Edwards Need Paul Tripp?
Categories
- 2006
- Adventures in Church History
- Application of Redemption
- Because Someone Has to Provide Oversight
- Being Human
- Book of Nature
- Christ and culture
- Christian politics
- Confessionalism
- Cornelius Van Til
- Evangelicalism
- Featured
- Forensics
- General Revelation
- J. Gresham Machen
- Jure Divino Presbyterianism
- Lordship of Christ
- Miscellany
- Neo-Calvinism
- Neo-Protestantism
- New World Presbyterianism
- Nicotine Theological Journal
- Novus Ordo Seclorum
- Old World Presbyterianism
- Orthodox Presbyterian Church
- Paleo Calvinism
- Piety with Excitement
- Piety without Exuberance
- sanctification
- Second Hand Smoke
- Shameless Selves Promotion
- Shock and Awe
- spirituality of the church
- The Hinge
- The Sacred Office
- The Wax Nose
- Wendell Berry
- Westminster
- Wilderness Wanderings
Forensic Friday: Antinomianism, False and True
One of the more arresting claims in recent theological discussions is that an emphasis on the forensic nature of justification can nurture antinomianism. This claim looks amazingly unreal given the traction that various forms of transformationalism have among conservative Reformed Protestants – from Doug Wilson’s defense of Constantinianism, the Baylys’ war with Reformed “pacifists†in… Read More→