Jason and the Callers don’t include the fine print in their call. We know. But I can’t imagine even the Callers have enough time to fill out all the surveys the bishops (and others) are sending.
Here’s one in preparation for the next Synod on the family:
The Socio-Cultural Context (ns. 5 – 8)
1. What initiatives are taking place and what are those planned in relation to the challenges these cultural changes pose to the family (cf. ns. 6 – 7): which initiatives are geared to reawaken an awareness of God’s presence in family life; to teaching and establishing sound interpersonal relationships; to fostering social and economic policies useful to the family; to alleviating difficulties associated with attention given to children, the elderly and family members who are ill; and to addressing more specific cultural factors present in the local Church?
2. What analytical tools are currently being used in these times of anthropological and cultural changes; what are the more significant positive or negative results? (cf. n. 5)
3. Beyond proclaiming God’s Word and pointing out extreme situations, how does the Church choose to be present “as Church” and to draw near families in extreme situations? (cf. n. 8). How does the Church seek to prevent these situations? What can be done to support and strengthen families of believers and those faithful to the bonds of marriage?
4. How does the Church respond, in her pastoral activity, to the diffusion of cultural relativism in secularized society and to the consequent rejection, on the part of many, of the model of family formed by a man and woman united in the marriage and open to life?
The Importance of Affectivity in Life (ns. 9 – 10)
5. How do Christian families bear witness, for succeeding generations, to the development and growth of a life of sentiment? (cf. ns. 9 – 10). In this regard, how might the formation of ordained ministers be improved? What qualified persons are urgently needed in this pastoral activity?
Pastoral Challenges (n. 11)
6. To what extent and by what means is the ordinary pastoral care of families addressed to those on the periphery? (cf. n. 11). What are the operational guidelines available to foster and appreciate the “desire to form a family” planted by the Creator in the heart of every person, especially among young people, including those in family situations which do not correspond to the Christian vision? How do they respond to the Church’s efforts in her mission to them? How prevalent is natural marriage among the non-baptized, also in relation to the desire to form a family among the young?
Part II
Looking at Christ: The Gospel of the Family . . .7. A fixed gaze on Christ opens up new possibilities. “Indeed, every time we return to the source of the Christian experience, new paths and undreamed of possibilities open up” (n. 12). How is the teaching from Sacred Scripture utilized in pastoral activity on behalf of families. To what extent does “fixing our gaze on Christ” nourish a pastoral care of the family which is courageous and faithful?
8. What marriage and family values can be seen to be realized in the life of young people and married couples? What form do they take? Are there values which can be highlighted? (cf. n. 13) What sinful aspects are to be avoided and overcome?
9. What human pedagogy needs to be taken into account — in keeping with divine pedagogy — so as better to understand what is required in the Church’s pastoral activity in light of the maturation of a couple’s life together which would lead to marriage in the future? (cf. n. 13)
10. What is being done to demonstrate the greatness and beauty of the gift of indissolubility so as to prompt a desire to live it and strengthen it more and more? (cf. n. 14)
11. How can people be helped to understand that a relationship with God can assist couples in overcoming the inherent weaknesses in marital relations? (cf. n. 14) How do people bear witness to the fact that divine blessings accompany every true marriage? How do people manifest that the grace of the Sacrament sustains married couples throughout their life together?
That is only the first eleven of FORTY-SIX!!!! sets of questions.
And then we have a survey on Pope Francis:
1. My view of Pope Francis is:
Favorable
Mostly Favorable
Mostly Unfavorable
Unfavorable
2. Since Pope Francis was elected, I am more interested in the Catholic faith.
Agree
Disagree
Comments3. Since Pope Francis was elected, I have attended Mass more often.
Agree
Disagree
Comments4. Pope Francis represents a major change in the direction of the church.
Agree
Disagree
Comments5. By now, I expected that Pope Francis would have made more concrete changes in the church.
Agree
Disagree
Comments6. The widespread media coverage of Pope Francis has been:
A big help in reforming the image of the Catholic Church.
Irrelevant to the life of the church.
Harmful because the media often misrepresents what Francis says.
Other
Other7. The comments Pope Francis has made on controversial topics often distort church teaching.
Agree
Disagree
Other
Other8. The area where I would most like to see more action from Pope Francis is:
Holding bishops accountable for not dealing properly with abusers in their dioceses.
Creating more leadership roles for women in the church.
Reforming the Curia.
Cleaning up the Vatican Bank.
Stopping the Vatican investigation of the Leadership Conference of Women Religious.
Enforcing better global standards for dealing with priest sexual abuse.
Other
Other9. I think Pope Francis’ frequent off-the-cuff interviews and informal approach have:
Made the papacy much more appealing to the average Catholic.
Robbed the papacy of much of its grandeur.
Not made much difference to how the pope is viewed.
Other
Other10. I have found myself paying closer attention to Catholic news since Pope Francis was elected.
Agree
Disagree
Comments11. I have been inspired by Pope Francis’ humble and simple lifestyle.
Agree
Disagree
Comments12. Laypeople are getting more of a role and voice in the church under Pope Francis.
Agree
Disagree
Comments13. I believe that Francis will make major reforms in the Vatican during his papacy.
Agree
Disagree
Comments14. Pope Francis doesn’t speak enough about abortion.
Agree
Disagree
Don’t have an opinion
Comments15. I find Pope Francis’ comments on homosexuality and same-sex relationships troubling.
Agree
Disagree
Comments16. I think Pope Francis is causing too much division within the church.
Agree
Disagree
Comments17. The best pope in the last 50 years has been:
Francis
Benedict XVI
John Paul II
John Paul I
Paul VI
Comments18. The most memorable thing Francis has done so far in his papacy is…
19. One thing about Pope Francis that has been a disappointment to me is…
20. If I could meet Pope Francis, I’d tell him…
21. If I had to grade Francis as pope so far, I’d give him a _____, because…
22. The quality that I like most about Pope Francis is…
23. The biggest surprise from Pope Francis has been…
24. One area in which Pope Francis is challenging me to become a better Catholic is…
25. My greatest hope for the remainder of Pope Francis’ papacy is…
Did ever a hierarchical church look more Babdist?
Audacious indeed.
Is there any we could convince the stubbly orb that resides beneath Bryan’s Hat to answer this survey and share the results with us? Money? One of Erik’s kids?
LikeLike
Did Luther post a survey?
LikeLike
Don’t think so, Brad. I wouldn’t worry about it.
LikeLike
My answer:
17. The best pope in the last 50 years has been: Comments I
LikeLike
Brad
Posted December 23, 2014 at 3:20 pm | Permalink
Did Luther post a survey?
In “Protestantism” they have votes all the time on what God says. The losers vote with their feet and just start a new church down the street. That’s how your church got started.
And if Christ’s teaching on divorce gets too unpopular, you just ignore it. In fact, the more marriages, the merrier!
http://www.cnn.com/2014/06/19/us/presbyterian-church-same-sex-marriage/
LikeLike
Tom: my Church is perfect in every way
Us: no it isn’t, here’s a thousand inconsistencies and problems with it
Tom: your Church isn’t perfect, so don’t pick on mine not being perfect
Us: we never said we were perfect, you were the one that said yours was perfect
Tom: your church isn’t perfect (repeat a million times)
LikeLike
kent, you left out this:
vd, t: your church isn’t perfect.
Us: no kidding.
vd, t: I never go to mine.
Us: you should go to church.
vd, t: your church gave American liberty to the world.
Us: are you for real?
LikeLike
Tom, here, have some Rabies theologorum for Xmas:
Merry Christmas and happy new year from Paul Tillich and AB, yo.
LikeLike
Quote above from Chapter 10 from liberal protestant and otherwise unorthodox PT.
Merry Christmas, Darryl.
LikeLike
kent
Posted December 25, 2014 at 8:08 am | Permalink
Tom: my Church is perfect in every way
Us: no it isn’t, here’s a thousand inconsistencies and problems with it
Tom: your Church isn’t perfect, so don’t pick on mine not being perfect
Us: we never said we were perfect, you were the one that said yours was perfect
Tom: your church isn’t perfect (repeat a million times)
D. G. Hart
Posted December 25, 2014 at 8:57 am | Permalink
kent, you left out this:
vd, t: your church isn’t perfect.
Us: no kidding.
vd, t: I never go to mine.
Us: you should go to church.
vd, t: your church gave American liberty to the world.
Us: are you for real?
TVD: You keep attacking the Catholic discussion of marriage, but you’re the ones [and your co-religionists in the other sects] who ignore Christ’s teaching on marriage. You’ve solved the problem in the worst way possible.
Your ad homs at me confirm and confess your confusion, for you have no principled reply. Work on thine own motes: “The Burden of Being Presbyterian” lies in your fellow Presbyterians, not the Catholics. That you choose as your targets those who have escaped your increasingly corrupted religion [“Jason and the Callers”] instead of those who are corrupting it
http://time.com/2911830/what-affirming-same-sex-marriage-means-for-the-presbyterian-church/
is the most fascinating thing of all about you people.
LikeLike
AB
Posted December 25, 2014 at 9:21 am | Permalink
Tom, here, have some Rabies theologorum for Xmas:
We think of the Reformation. This was a moment in the history of the Church in which the question of authority was once more in the center of events. Luther, and consequently the whole Protestant world, broke away from the Roman Church and from 1500 years of Christian tradition when no agreement about the authority of the pope and the councils could be reached. Here, again, someone had arisen who spoke and acted with an authority the sources of which could not be determined by legal means. And here also we must ask, “Are the Catholic authorities who rejected him in the name of their established authority to be blamed for it?” But if we do not blame them, we can ask them, “Why do you blame the Jewish authorities who did exactly the same as you did when the people said of the Reformers that they spoke with authority and not like the priests and monks?” Is the same thing so different if it is done by the Jewish high priest and if it is done by the Roman high priest? And one may ask the present-day Protestant authorities in Europe and in this country, “Are you certain that the insistence on your authority, on your tradition, and on your experience does not suppress the kind of authority which Jesus had in mind?”
Merry Christmas and happy new year from Paul Tillich and AB, yo.
As [St.] Thomas More pointed out–predicted–rejecting the Magisterium created more chaos than truth. The Reformation has thousands [or millions] of popes.
That is not reform. They multiplied the problem of error exponentially. Indeed, Tillich mentions Luther approvingly, but Lutherans get dissed around here too!
So thx for the principled reply, Brother Buckingham, a rare gift hereabouts indeed. Happy Xmas to you as well, although you Puritans are pretty much humbugs about the whole deal.
LikeLike
TVD,
Jason has gone so far to say that Protestantism isn’t even Christianity:
If Jason and Bryan wanted to leave, that’s fine. They turned their guns on us, and we had to put up with it for 2.5 years after Jason apostasized. Now, if you listen to his podcast, he’s lightened up some, although I’m sure he would relish the opportunity to start firing and me, Machen, and Darryl. The JATC channel at OLTS is a defensive posture, PERIOD. And as Erik said, it’s working, because you don’t really see any more trophy conversions. So get used to this feature here. Sorry.
I fail to see what point you are trying to make about protestantism and homosexuality, so please, elaborate for me and those reading here.
LikeLike
Tom,
Thomas More, the killer of many protestants, yes I know the name. Please feel free to continue this discussion here if you want to. It’s an old and very trodden path if we are to do that. Post to your heart’s content on my site, anything you like. I’m not up to the prot/cath throw anything at us slugfest right now. I’m going to watch The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey with my wife pretty soon, and go to bed.
Go in peace, friend.
LikeLike
More on More, since Tom brought him in. Yo.
LikeLike
I was merely crediting More for his argument, to illustrate that it’s 500 years old.
As for your pal Tillich, here is he denying the bodily resurrection of Christ, where his Catholic cohort accepts it because the Magisterium teaches it.
http://is.gd/Cl6AOZ
This is not to discredit Tillich personally–as you attempt to do here with Thomas More–but to point out the problem of “every man his own magisterium.” Or worse, that one’s church “votes” in some heresy that forces one to leave [and start a new “orthodox” church down the block].
Probably my biggest problem with this little “theological society” here is its propensity to sink to ad hom at the drop of a hat. To your credit, at least you spare your interlocutors, even if you don’t spare third parties.
As for your quote from Jason Stellman, you do realize that it’s rather a mirror image of RC Sproul’s rejection of Catholicism as authentically Christian
http://www.ligonier.org/blog/the-manhattan-declaration/
if not Machen’s.
http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/2013/05/gresham-machen-friend-to-catholics
[As for Chesterton’s argument via Stellman, heh heh, it’s beyond the hand-to-hand combat level of this blog. It’s nuclear warfare.]
LikeLike
Tom, the OPC believes she not only is the true succession to presbyterianism in America, but along with the divines, the catholic church too:
more later. peace.
LikeLike
Maybe tom will answer
https://oldlife.org/2014/12/folded-or-dirty/comment-page-1/#comment-215912
Sinr bC won’t
LikeLike
Tom,
Re: Thomas More:
Shall I keep going?
LikeLike
AB, you should ask vd, t, which kind of RC he is and why even traditional RC’s are so wobbly:
Is he one of those Roman Catholics who doesn’t believe in the resurrection?
And for all his bluster, mainline Protestants are two times more likely to affirm the value of marriage as traditional Roman Catholics.
LikeLike
DGH, I would, but my family needs me. It’s your blog.
If you want, ping me on Twitter etc anytime. I figured out how to outfit my website with a Disqus format (like at Patheos, just FYI). Thanks for the links!!
LikeLike
PS
Tom,
As I understand, JGM said RCism could be a perversion of Xtianity, contrasted with the liberal Xtianity of his day, which was much worse. Of course I am in Machen’s regiment, not Tillich’s.
Thanks for reading. My family needs me now. Toodles.
LikeLike
AB
Posted December 26, 2014 at 12:49 am | Permalink
Tom, the OPC believes she not only is the true succession to presbyterianism in America, but along with the divines, the catholic church too:
That’s what I like about it. You think you’re the Catholic Church too, only instead of getting bigger, you keep getting smaller___________
AB
Posted December 26, 2014 at 9:11 am | Permalink
Tom,
Re: Thomas More:
Jeremy,
I’ve written way to much, so I’ll simply post an abstract here followed with the details which you may or may not be interested in.
Bryan & Neal’s argument was not compelling. The infallible magisterium runs counter to the spirit of the NT.
Well, here you’re using the sola Scriptura hermeneutic, so of course magisterium is “contrary to the NT.” Sola scriptura is the direct opposition to magisterium, so basically, your argument is circular.
One big problem is that sola scriptura isn’t in the Bible, no matter how much the sons of the Reformation torture the Scriptures to say so.
__________________________
D. G. Hart
Posted December 26, 2014 at 10:31 am | Permalink
AB, you should ask vd, t, which kind of RC he is and why even traditional RC’s are so wobbly:
What don’t you ask him yourself?
Because you know my answer is that I’m interested in ideas and concepts, not trashing people and playing your contradiction and nullification game. If a pope can be wrong–and they can–see Aquinas
http://spectator.org/articles/54802/when-paul-corrected-peter
so can any other Catholic or Christian. so once again, Darryl, you lose the debate you yourself started just by proceeding on a false premise.
_________________________
AB
Posted December 26, 2014 at 1:57 pm | Permalink
PS
Tom,
As I understand, JGM said RCism could be a perversion of Xtianity, contrasted with the liberal Xtianity of his day, which was much worse.
Unfortunately, Old Life, its author and its followers are far more obsessed with Catholicism rather than the perversion of Presbyterianism.
Of course I am in Machen’s regiment, not Tillich’s.
Again, I brought up Tillich only to show that even a Protestant you quote so approvingly is capable of grave error precisely because he rejects the Magisterium. A Catholic theologian isn’t free to reject Jesus’s resurrection. A Protestant [or “Presbyterian” or “Reformed”] theologian, the sky’s the limit.
And although you cling to your Confessions–which is a good thing–like constitutions, they can be changed by a vote–and indeed were created by one.
As for Machen, I like him. One of the few reasons I abide the sophistry around here. That, and to give you the chance to justify your positions. In this discussion, Christ’s explicit teaching on marriage in the Bible was ignored, and I don’t blame you.
LikeLike
Tom, you, Bryan, and so many others hate on Oldlife. Yet none of you can get enough. It’s cool, we know you could hang around Patheos blogs withs Enns and his disqus, or Bryan and his moderated comments with no ad-homs. We know you like it here. Just try to enjoy yourself. We’re not changing anything here, just sitting at the bar as drinking buds. I’m out.
LikeLike
AB
Posted December 26, 2014 at 11:04 pm | Permalink
Tom, you, Bryan, and so many others hate on Oldlife. Yet none of you can get enough. It’s cool, we know you could hang around Patheos blogs withs Enns and his disqus, or Bryan and his moderated comments with no ad-homs. We know you like it here. Just try to enjoy yourself. We’re not changing anything here, just sitting at the bar as drinking buds. I’m out.</i.
As long as Darryl keeps ginning up such inept attacks on Catholicism and Bryan keeps smacking him down, I'll keep reading.
It's wonderful for learning about the actual truth about Catholicism, and the depth of ignorance of otherwise intelligent and educated people.
“There are not a hundred people in America who hate the Catholic Church. There are millions of people who hate what they wrongly believe to be the Catholic Church — which is, of course, quite a different thing.”—Fulton Sheen
See, I could easily put Darryl in the former category, but he’s yet to prove he understands a damn thing about Catholicism–as Bryan proves weekly.
As for the rest, I keep giving you and Darryl’s acolytes a chance to make your case, but mostly we get the resident attack chihuahua junking up the threads with YouTube links to teenage boy movies.
LikeLike
Tom, so file a complaint against me to presbytery. You’re making a mountain out of a molehill. Chill.
Beer time. Lates.
LikeLike
AB
Posted December 27, 2014 at 12:04 am | Permalink
Tom, so file a complaint against me to presbytery. You’re making a mountain out of a molehill. Chill.
Beer time. Lates.
You left 10 comments ago, Mr. Hello I Must Be Going. And you’re not really an attack chihuahua, I was thinking of that other fellow. You make a good-faith attempt at apologetics for your religion and I dutifully read the evidence and arguments you present.
I was favorably disposed to Tillich until I stumbled across that thing about him denying the Resurrection, which was kind of appalling and a deal-breaker. Hell, even the unitarian near-infidel Joseph Priestley believed in the Resurrection!
The more I listen to you people, the more I think More was right, is all. The Reformation didn’t correct error, it multiplied it!
LikeLike
Ok, Tom.
By the way, Tillich was a womanizer:
Stick with Scripture, but yeah yeah, Saint Thomas More, I know I know.
You do know you are talking to a Saint right now, right? That’s how St. Paul addresses Xtians in his letters.
LikeLike
I hear you:
Hello, I must be going. Movies and booze await, yo.
Peace.
LikeLike
vd, t, what does George Weigel not understand?
LikeLike
The real question is, why does the clergy give a crap what the laity thinks? This is Catholicism? Sounds like a Babdist congregational meeting, indeed.
LikeLike
Tom – Unfortunately, Old Life, its author and its followers are far more obsessed with Catholicism rather than the perversion of Presbyterianism
Erik – Maybe because Catholics recruit our members, occasionally successfully, while Mainline Presbyterians really don’t recruit anyone. They’re old and dying. They don’t need our help to fade away into oblivion — they take care of that themselves.
Do I worry about the neighborhood bully or the senile little old lady out walking her cat?
LikeLike
And if you paid attention, Tom, you would realize that the entire thrust of our project is to point out the difference between the unrealistic Roman Catholic ideal to which Bryan & the Callers point and the Roman Catholic Church we see in real life — a church that becomes more & more liberal with each day’s headlines.
If you didn’t have a chip on your shoulder and weren’t so bent on cheering for what you somehow think is your home team, you might actually agree with us and help us, being that liberalism appears to be your own personal mortal enemy.
LikeLike
If Weigel was listened to, the first step would be to drop the priestly celibacy requirement. Attract married men with testosterone and leadership ability — husbands and fathers. The Church would tear it up.
LikeLike
And Erik, we’re called to love(https://oldlife.org/2014/12/turns-out-this-liturgical-calendar-thingy-is-complicated/comment-page-1/#comment-258355) RCs.
Tom appears as permanent a fixture as you or me. Best we learn to enjoy this longstanding feature. Toodles.
LikeLike
Erik, but remember, vd, t is also on David Barton’s team. (Figuring that out would cause you to lose a mullet.)
LikeLike
I don’t mind Tom on the (rare) days that he actually has a point to make.
The problem is, when you’re a semi-somehow-kinda-sorta religious universalist you’re really not affirming much, so any criticisms you have of anyone else’s religion don’t carry much weight.
It’s like setting up an apologetics website and calling it Called to Meh.
LikeLike
Tom feels things strongly. He’s just not exactly sure why.
LikeLike
Erik, well said. The game plan with him is get him to mass. We dont need more caller websites, as fun as Called to Meh would be, for me to a moderator of. Merry Xmas and happy new year, bro.
LikeLike
Being that he circulates in a milieu of Los Angeles actors, musicians, and attorneys it’s amazing he is as close to orthodox Christianity as he is. And by close I mean, not very.
LikeLike
I know my method of pointing people to Tillich is .. suspect. There’s a method to my madness. I like that him and me were on game shows..
LikeLike
I dug his latest post.
LikeLike
Of course If You Can Put A Woman in the Pulpit, You Can Self-Serve the Lord’s Supper on the Moon. Yo.
D. G. Hart
Posted December 28, 2014 at 5:32 pm | Permalink
Erik, but remember, vd, t is also on David Barton’s team. (Figuring that out would cause you to lose a mullet.)
Erik Charter
Posted December 28, 2014 at 6:02 pm | Permalink
I don’t mind Tom on the (rare) days that he actually has a point to make.
The problem is, when you’re a semi-somehow-kinda-sorta religious universalist you’re really not affirming much, so any criticisms you have of anyone else’s religion don’t carry much weight.
It’s like setting up an apologetics website and calling it Called to Meh.
Erik Charter
Posted December 28, 2014 at 6:03 pm | Permalink
Tom feels things strongly. He’s just not exactly sure why.
AB
Posted December 28, 2014 at 8:15 pm | Permalink
Erik, well said. The game plan with him is get him to mass. We dont need more caller websites, as fun as Called to Meh would be, for me to a moderator of. Merry Xmas and happy new year, bro.
Erik Charter
Posted December 28, 2014 at 9:42 pm | Permalink
Being that he circulates in a milieu of Los Angeles actors, musicians, and attorneys it’s amazing he is as close to orthodox Christianity as he is. And by close I mean, not very.
AB
Posted December 28, 2014 at 9:59 pm | Permalink
I know my method of pointing people to Tillich is .. suspect. There’s a method to my madness. I like that him and me were on game shows..
AB
Posted December 28, 2014 at 10:07 pm | Permalink
I dug his latest post.
AB
Posted December 28, 2014 at 10:14 pm | Permalink
Of course If You Can Put A Woman in the Pulpit, You Can Self-Serve the Lord’s Supper on the Moon. Yo.
Because NASA was receiving flack from Madalyn Murray O’Hair for the astronauts on Apollo 8 reading from Genesis, the federal authorities decided to let Aldrin commune on his own without a radio broadcast of the event.
Oh, am I still here? I thought I left. I sure tried, Mr. Hello, I Must be Going.
And no, Darryl, I’m not on Barton’s team. I won’t insult your intelligence to suggest you really believe what you just said.
[HT: WFB.]
LikeLike
David Barton Wins Apology, $$ From Political Attackers.
Notice the comments and defense.
LikeLike
Tom, three questions:
-How is it the church plant we started morning worship in August continues to thrive?
-What would happen if you tried out a local OPC, and you liked it?
–What is the airspeed velocity of an unladed swallow?
LikeLike
Darryl,
Good comment and links, Bearded Spock TVD (compared to the real spock who we all know who that is) is a hoot.
LikeLike
Called to sign.
LikeLike
Called to pledge.
LikeLike
Called yet again to sign:
LikeLike
Well, the church asks the laity what to do.
LikeLike
Below their pay grade?
LikeLike
Darryl, well, Francis did say “don’t be like bunnies.”
LikeLike
The bishops asked too much so answer this:
LikeLike
Will the bishops listen to the laity on the death penalty?
LikeLike
The only life the bishops don’t favor is the life that could have come forth from their own loins
Think about that. The genetics of those with the charism continually die off.
LikeLike
Answering not with logic but their feet (and other body parts):
LikeLike
But does the hierarchy want to hear from the priests? Not so much:
So polls are a valuable means of communication, public letters are not.
Should a priest call his universal bishop?
LikeLike
Are these legitimate paths of communication?
LikeLike
Called to pay, pray, obey, duck, and cover:
LikeLike
Called to advertise:
LikeLike
When Pew surveys, we can ignore, but when the bishops survey, does Mark advocate the same?
LikeLike