Just to follow up on what to do about a culture in decay, I couldn’t help but notice what the Psalmist writes in Ps. 102:
25 Of old you laid the foundation of the earth,
and the heavens are the work of your hands.
26 They will perish, but you will remain;
they will all wear out like a garment.
You will change them like a robe, and they will pass away,
27 but you are the same, and your years have no end.
28 The children of your servants shall dwell secure;
their offspring shall be established before you.
Calvin explains these verses this way:
Here the sacred writer amplifies what he had previously stated, declaring, that compared with God the whole world is a form which quickly vanishes away; and yet a little after he represents the Church as exempted from this the common lot of all sublunary things, because she has for her foundation the word of God, while her safety is secured by the same word. Two subjects are therefore here brought under our consideration. The first is, that since the heavens themselves are in the sight of God almost as evanescent as smoke, the frailty of the whole human race is such as may well excite his compassion; and the second is, that although there is no stability in the heavens and the earth, yet the Church shall continue steadfast for ever, because she is upheld by the eternal truth of God.
Okay, maybe Calvin was like me, mean, a Calvinist and a jerk. Add to that fundamentalist in his understanding of the world’s fleeting nature. But wouldn’t a little more of this paleo-Calvinism help the neo-Calvinists cope when the transformation of culture doesn’t pan out?
But wouldn’t a little more of this paleo-Calvinism help the neo-Calvinists cope when the transformation of culture doesn’t pan out?
Maybe they didn’t get the memo, it already isn’t panning out. Late modernity is far more amenable to the sort of lives most Americans and Westerners aspire to live to. Even if the culture were to shift toward something more favorable to Reformed Christianity, the shift would likely not be instigated by Christian cultural transformers. I am of the opinion that there are a few critical drivers of culture, and the one most likely to upend modernism will be economic disruption and the broken promise of unbroken cultural and technological progression.
LikeLike
“I am of the opinion that there are a few critical drivers of culture, and the one most likely to upend modernism will be economic disruption and the broken promise of unbroken cultural and technological progression.”
Ideas have consequences. If there are consequences they came from ideas. If we rise or fall as a culture it is because our presuppositions are wrong. Our hope is to think God’s thoughts after him in the field of economics. Thinking about economics independent of God is akin to the sin of Adam eating the fruit.
Did I say that right?
LikeLike
Speaking of drivers and consequences and ideas, my dad used to tell me all the time, “just do something! Even if it’s wrong!”
LikeLike
oops
Did I say that right?
What’s scary is how right it was. Forgive my concern for you Muddy – maybe I’ve been watching too much Star Wars with my sons, but I must say – Once you start down the dark path, forever will it dominate your destiny…. Three recitations of WLC, and two readings through The Lost Soul of American Protestantism and you should be okay.
LikeLike
Strictly based on the post photo I have this to offer in light of Baltimore:
THEY HATE THESE BUILDINGS!!!
LikeLike
Jed, let me help you with that.
Three on the day.
Quiet until June 11th.
Who’s next.
LikeLike
Okay, maybe Calvin was like me, mean, a Calvinist and a jerk.
You left out in a dinghy behind the party boats.
LikeLike
Jed, don’t forget to add Hunter’s “To Change the World” in that prescription.
LikeLike
Navin Johnson for President.
LikeLike
p.s. A propos of my last suggestion, if Navin R. Johnson were elected and he behaved like most presidents, we could say “that guy is such a jerk” without falling afoul of Romans 13.
LikeLike
David, but claiming to have been born a poor black child and recalling singing and dancing on the porch with his family down in Mississippi would be sufficient to lose him any election. But that’s fine, because he still doesn’t need you or anybody–just this ashtray, paddle game, remote control, these matches, this lamp, and that’s all he needs. And this chair, he needs that. What are looking at, what do you think he is, some kind of jerk or something?
LikeLike
Jed and Zrim, perhaps add some Voegelin, maybe “Science, Politics and Gnosticism”?
LikeLike
what to do about a culture in decay”
“Our hope is to think God’s thoughts after him in the field of economics.”
“the ultimate goal of economics is to improve the living conditions of people in their everyday life.”
… so we operate in and point to the better ‘culture’ (a group with its own beliefs, way of life, etc.) and it’s King, Jesus…who came to give life, life abundant, and who will establish and uphold His government over His kingdom with justice and righteousness, forevermore.
Like clothing He will change the current heavens and earth and they will be changed. (Ps 102 26 b) He has promised, saying, “Yet once more I will shake not only the earth, but also the heaven.” This expression, “Yet once more,” denotes the removing of those things which can be shaken, as of created things, so that those things which cannot be shaken may remain. Therefore, since we receive a kingdom which cannot be shaken, let us show gratitude, by which we may offer to God an acceptable service with reverence and awe
We know that the whole creation and we with the Spirit first fruits groan, wait eagerly for our adoption as sons. Faith is the assurance of things hoped for, the conviction of things not seen, and without faith it is impossible to please Him, for he who comes to God must believe that He is and that He is a rewarder of those who seek Him. Those who see His promises and welcome them from a distance and confess being strangers and exiles on the earth make it clear that they are seeking a better country of their own and gain approval through their faith. Therefore God is not ashamed to be called their God for He has prepared a city for them. There is laid up the crown of righteousness for all who have loved Jesus’ appearing.
so we say to us all : “See to it that you do not refuse Him who is speaking”
btw, first for me and for you -don’t think mean jerks are operating in that culture. Though outwardly we are decaying, inwardly we are being renewed
LikeLike
Add to that fundamentalist in his understanding of the world’s fleeting nature. But wouldn’t a little more of this paleo-Calvinism help the neo-Calvinists cope when the transformation of culture doesn’t pan out?
The “culture” cannot [and should not] be engaged outside the parameters of the natural law, and since “culture” is indeed mutable, such a discussion is useless without natural law as its starting point.
CCC:
1958 The natural law is immutable and permanent throughout the variations of history; it subsists under the flux of ideas and customs and supports their progress. The rules that express it remain substantially valid. Even when it is rejected in its very principles, it cannot be destroyed or removed from the heart of man. It always rises again in the life of individuals and societies:
“Theft is surely punished by your law, O Lord, and by the law that is written in the human heart, the law that iniquity itself does not efface.” [Augustine]
Calvinist International’s Wedgeworth:
The past few years have seen a number of publications putting forth the thesis that the Protestant Reformation held to a belief in natural law and advocated a socio-political theory known as the “two kingdoms.” This has been construed as a move away from a previous consensus that the Reformation and Calvinism in particular believed that their faith was for all of life and that Christ’s mission required a transformation of culture. That concept, it is argued, should be understood as “neo-Calvinism” and is actually a step away from the Reformation tradition. Complicating the discussion is the fact that this is not merely a historical debate, but indeed a competition between contemporary political programs. In what follows I will argue that the Reformation did indeed advocate natural law and a distinction between two kingdoms, but this was not a precursor to modern political Liberalism.
…
And so there is at least a case to be made that once the older Reformed doctrines are properly understood, they will not be seen as irreconcilable with the best representatives of the Neo-Calvinist project. To do this would require another article, but for now we can say that the older doctrines do stand in sharp contrast with the new two kingdoms proposal as well, and that should be telling. The contemporary proposals are not representations of the older view, and the one thing that is certain is that the individuals and churches involved in the Reformation were not without significant accompanying political and cultural reactions.
http://www.credenda.org/index.php/Theology/two-kingdoms-critique.html
&c.
LikeLike
TVD,
If you wan’t to get the feel for the older Reformed tradition, check out the works of Richard Muller. The Reformed Scholastics most definitely held to Natural Law. I can’t remember the exact work, but he also delves into the Reformed Resistance Theorists. Not everyone here agrees with my own views on political resistance, but I would say that it falls broadly in the NL2K camp.
DGH’s historical work is concerned with far later subject matter generally than Scholasticism.
LikeLike
PS
My favorite part of the blog post.
Next.
LikeLike
Yet while the earth remains, indeed let us bring on the paleo-Calvinism:
“But it is questioned whether the law pertains to the kingdom of Christ, which is spiritual and distinct from all earthly dominion; and there are some men, not otherwise ill-disposed, to whom it appears that our condition under the Gospel is different from that of the ancient people under the law; not only because the kingdom of Christ is not of this world, but because Christ was unwilling that the beginnings of His kingdom should be aided by the sword. But, when human judges consecrate their work to the promotion of Christ’s kingdom, I deny that on that account its nature is changed. For, although it was Christ’s will that His Gospel should be proclaimed by His disciples in opposition to the power of the whole world, and He exposed them armed with the Word alone like sheep amongst the wolves, He did not impose on Himself an eternal law that He should never bring kings under His subjection, nor tame their violence, nor change them from being cruel persecutors into the patrons and guardians of His Church.”
John Calvin
Commentaries on the Four Last Books of Moses – p. 77.
LikeLike
Frank, but Calvin says Christ’s kingdom is not of this world. Christ himself and his apostles acted that out. Only the Eastern Orthodox and Roman Catholics baptized the emperor. Do you really want to go there?
LikeLike
Frank, Google tells me your quotation is accurate. Thanks for sharing.
LikeLike
Dr. Hart, you might want to consider whether it is really “paleo-Calvinism” that you’re after.
The answer lies in the kingdom is not of (from/source) this world, but it is undoubtedly “in” the world.
LikeLike
Frank, don’t you mean “in Christendom.” State support for religion did not come until the fourth century. It ended at the end of the eighteenth. Are you really interested in Calvin or Constantine?
Or maybe, it’s Judah. Just be sure to get into the livestock business before work on the Temple begins.
LikeLike
Jed Paschall
Posted April 30, 2015 at 8:46 pm | Permalink
TVD,
If you wan’t to get the feel for the older Reformed tradition, check out the works of Richard Muller. The Reformed Scholastics most definitely held to Natural Law.
Yes, I’m familiar with “Protestant Scholasticism,” thanks, Jed. It seems that some people around here need to brush up more than I for reasons given above. Jordan Ballor is an acquaintance of mine, love his stuff.
http://calvinistinternational.com/2013/08/02/the-reformations-reboot-of-scholasticism/
LikeLike
TVD, google is great, isn’t it?
Try Fesko, likely the brightest mind reformed scholasticism has today, up there with Muller, no doubt:
Who’s next?
LikeLike
Richard Hooker, perhaps. Anything to palatably Protestantize Aquinas for the unwilling.
http://www.credenda.org/index.php/Theology/natural-law-a-paleo-reformed-defense.html
“If it’s not Protestant, it’s crap!”
LikeLike
TVD, come on. You know only links to the wire
that’s protestant whiskey
next
LikeLike
Calvin—“But as the soul of Christ was set free from prison, so human souls also are set free before they perish.”
http://www.godrules.net/library/calvin/142calvin_c10.htm
Martin Luther—“As soon as thy eyes have closed shalt thou be woken, a thousand years shall be as if thou hadst slept but a little half hour. Just as at night we hear the clock strike and know not how long we have slept, so too, and how much more, are in death a thousand years soon past.”
LikeLike
vd, t goes hollywood: “Jordan Ballor is an acquaintance of mine”
Except Jordan lives in W. Michigan.
LikeLike
D. G. Hart
Posted May 1, 2015 at 7:58 pm | Permalink
vd, t goes hollywood: “Jordan Ballor is an acquaintance of mine”
Except Jordan lives in W. Michigan.
But he is, as are you. His work is stronger.
LikeLike
Mr. Hart,
Your public prayers may be disheveled but your prose here got me dancin’.
Paleo vs neo! Loved it man.
LikeLike
Dr. Hart, doesn’t make much sense to claim to be paleo Calvinist and regularly reject fundamental tenets espoused by Calvin.
Better to admit you really are a “neo-Calvinist”, but just of a different stripe from the Dutch strain you critique.
LikeLike
Norm!Frank!what
ever
LikeLike