Alexis de Tocqueville on Roman Catholicism and the United States well before Bryan and the Jasons:
At the present time, more than in any previous age, we find Catholics turning into unbelievers and Protestants turning Catholic. Catholicism seen from the inside seems to be losing, but seen from the outside, to be gaining. There is a reason for this.
Our contemporaries are naturally little disposed to belief, but once they accept religion at all, there is a hidden instinct within them which unconsciously urges them toward Catholicsm. Many of the doctrines and customs of the Roman Chuch astonish them, but they feel a secret admiration for its discipline, and its extraordinary unity attracts them.
If Catholicism could ultimately escape from the political animosities to which it has given rise, I am almost certain that that same spirit of the age which now seems so contrary to it would turn into a powerful ally and it would suddenly make great conquests.
George Will on Pope Francis:
Francis’s fact-free flamboyance reduces him to a shepherd whose selectively reverent flock, genuflecting only at green altars, is tiny relative to the publicity it receives from media otherwise disdainful of his church. Secular people with anti-Catholic agendas drain his prestige, a dwindling asset, into promotion of policies inimical to the most vulnerable people and unrelated to what once was the papacy’s very different salvific mission.
He stands against modernity, rationality, science and, ultimately, the spontaneous creativity of open societies in which people and their desires are not problems but precious resources. Americans cannot simultaneously honor him and celebrate their nation’s premises.
I know lots of apologists are upset with Will. But when you think how archly conservative the papacy was at the time of the Syllabus of Errors (1864) and how much the bishops at Vatican 2 wanted to open up the church to the modern world, Will has a point. Maybe Pope Francis is right about modernity. But that’s not what Vatican 2 set out to do.
#nocherrypicking
The ubiquity of Modernity demands a response from all Christian groups. As a Protestant, I am far more comfortable with Rome being exactly what it is – a conservative Medieval institution that claims to be the Church that Christ founded.
I’d rather live with the anathemas of Trent, because they are at least an honest response from Rome as it tried to preserve itself from the Reformation, than deal with the hand waving of Vatican 2 that made us “separated brethren” without attempting to genuinely deal with Trent and what it meant and means for Rome today. Rome comes off as disingenuous to anyone who aspires to be a faithful son of the Reformation, hiding behind Papal supremacy and historical revisionism that finds its way even to their contemporary confessional/conciliar witness.
Of course I’d rather see Rome confess the error that Trent truly was and rejoin the catholic church in its willingness to be reformed by the Word, but I am not holding my breath for a naked miracle that Rome seems to have no interest in.
LikeLike
I’m not sure y’all have this anathema business together.
http://www.catholic.com/quickquestions/does-the-church-condemn-those-who-disagree-with-its-teachings
LikeLike
Since George Will is an atheist, what he thinks matters not a lot. Mostly, it’s the worldwide left who hate and hurt the Church [almost axiomatically], and this Barney the Christosaur Pope is getting them off its back. Good move by Rome, esp after the child abuse scandals. The stench is dissipating.
LikeLike
This is difficult because Francis’ Argentine versioin of Liberation theology finds it’s groundswell in ‘prophetic upheavel’ of lay charism and the religious(orders) revolution that Vat II brought forth. The policies may in fact be more medieval, in effect, than modernizing but the attempt to embrace modernity was the inspiration.
LikeLike
Forgive me [……] if I sin, but every time I see a photo of Francis I can’t help but think of Peter Sellers in his role of Chauncy in the movie:
Being There
LikeLike
vd, t, right. The Crusades and Inquisition were just figments of Christian Scientists’ imagination.
I know, the Vatican didn’t do this. Well, while the papacy had temporal power it did execute criminals. But where do you think the Spanish got the idea that heretics were a problem?
Vd, t, you’re smarter than this.
LikeLike
I take back my inappropriate comparison between Chauncy Gardener and Pope Francis. Chauncy was wiser…
I guess the Pope can create natural “rights” for the environment like the Fed Chairman can create dollars for the economy — out of thin air…
LikeLike
D. G. Hart
Posted September 24, 2015 at 9:24 pm | Permalink
vd, t, right. The Crusades and Inquisition were just figments of Christian Scientists’ imagination.
I know, the Vatican didn’t do this. Well, while the papacy had temporal power it did execute criminals. But where do you think the Spanish got the idea that heretics were a problem?
Vd, t, you’re smarter than this.
Dr. Hart, the Crusades? the Inquisition? Not only boring and simplistic, but they have absolutely nothing to do with what I wrote. I wish I could say you’re smarter than this, but I’m beginning to wonder.
LikeLike
I thought you all would appreciate this gem:
Congressman Bob Brady Steal Pope Francis Glass To Sip Remaining Water With His Wife & Sprinkle On His Grandchildren
I’d comment, but none is necessary.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3249286/Holy-water-Congressman-steals-Pope-Francis-glass-White-House-address-sip-remaining-liquid-wife-saves-sprinkle-grandchildren.html
LikeLike
Publius,
But maybe Francis was drinking bottled Lourdes Water!
LikeLike
Publius, I didn’t think you were allowed to use the relics.
LikeLike
In some ways, I can see the attraction of Roman Catholicism, especially if I were a social traditionalist. A day after the Pope left DC, the children of Machen descended on DC for the annual Values Voter Summit. Frankly, as much as I like this website, I’ll take the Pope and his Catholicism over Kim Davis and her non-mainline Protestantism.
LikeLike
This website hates ’em all. In fact the Warrior Children eat each other if they don’t have somebody else to attack. Piranha for Christ.
LikeLike
Bobby, right, Old Lifers have been all over defending Kim Davis. Not.
But you know, the Roman Catholics here, vd,t and Mermaid, love her.
Do you pay any attention? Has liberal Protestantism addled your brain?
LikeLike
Toldja.
LikeLike
vd, t, you left out how you’re a Machen Warrior by Bobby’s odd reckoning.
LikeLike
vd, t, slow night in tinsel town?
Back from an early mass?
All set for USC?
LikeLike
TVD
Posted September 26, 2015 at 9:36 pm | Permalink
This website hates ’em all. In fact the Warrior Children eat each other if they don’t have somebody else to attack. Piranha for Christ.
D. G. Hart
Posted September 26, 2015 at 9:45 pm | Permalink
Bobby, right, Old Lifers have been all over defending Kim Davis. Not.
But you know, the Roman Catholics here, vd,t and Mermaid, love her.
Do you pay any attention? Has liberal Protestantism addled your brain?
TVD
Posted September 26, 2015 at 9:57 pm | Permalink
Toldja.>>>>
I love you, too, Brother Hart, and wish you would stand up for the unborn and for the Biblical morality you say you believe in.
Just one little blog post defending the right to life would be nice. You don’t have to pray the Rosary in front of your local Planned Parenthood, but you could use the power of the metaphorical pen to let your voice be heard.
LikeLike
Mermaid, you do know that defending the unborn is different from defending Kim Davis?
LikeLike