I let it go and then Aquila Report picked up Tim Challies’ recommendations for how to find good books. In the context of debates about safe spaces on university campuses and some students’ desire to avoid the dark and less encouraging parts of human existence, Challies’ advice sounds familiar:
Who wrote you? Familiarize yourself with trustworthy authors. As a reader you should have your list of favorites, the short list of people you regard as especially influential and trustworthy. I believe there is a lot of value in tracking a few authors through the course of their career and reading—or at least considering—every one of their books. This is difficult with an R.C. Sproul since if you begin today you are 100 books behind, but much easier with younger authors who have a shorter list of works. Don’t know where to begin? Then ask a friend or pastor. Or ask me. I’d try people like H.B. Charles Jr., Kevin DeYoung, Gloria Furman, Russell Moore, Andy Naselli, Barnabas Piper, or Jen Wilkin—people like that. They have each written a few books but not so many that you’ll need to spend two years catching up, and they are all likely to write quite a few more. Find “your” authors and read what they write. But then also track who endorses their books, who speaks at conferences with them, and so on. Start to look for connections.
Who published you? You should familiarize yourself with Christian publishers and learn which of them are especially trustworthy. There are quite a lot of excellent publishers whose books may vary by quality and secondary theological issues but which will never fall outside the conservative Evangelical stream. Learn to trust these ones. Among them are Banner of Truth, Christian Focus, Crossway, Evangelical Press, Matthias Media, P&R, Reformation Heritage, Reformation Trust, The Good Book Company, (and, I hope, Cruciform Press since I was involved in founding it). If they publish it, you can be quite confident in it. Other publishers publish a much wider range of titles and, depending on the company, the imprint, or the department, their titles may range from very good to quite concerning or from very good to outright heretical. For these you will need to exercise a bit more caution. Here I refer to IVP, Eerdmans, Multnomah, Thomas Nelson, Zondervan, as well as the faith or Christian imprints of large mainstream publishers (Harper Collins, Penguin, and so on).
Two troubling aspects of this counsel stand out. One, it assumes that Christians are readers who only look for books that agree with their own outlook. This is a big difference between New Calvinists and Neo-Calvinists. The latter read widely, try to learn from the best scholars in a variety of fields, and have confidence that challenging reading material will not destroy a reader’s faith. In other words, Neo-Calvinists understand the merits of the Pulitzer Prize. New Calvinists cultivate a safe space shelf of books.
The other problem is this: Challies’ advice explains how the Gospel Coalition and celebrity pastors happen, or Jen Hatmaker for that matter. Readers who want trustworthy authors and publishers, and learn to associate certain names with edifying material, are not going to be critical or discerning of the books on the safe-space shelf. Instead of iron sharpening iron it’s pillow softening pillow. And it does become an echo chamber that is so far removed from the mainstream that I’m surprised Tim Keller is part of the enterprise. He seems to aspire to Big Apple relevance but has a following in a pietistic ghetto, or TKNY’s urbanism should scare off those who seek reassuring authors and publishers.
I give New Calvinists credit for not portraying themselves as the smartest Christians in the room, though their attachment to Jonathan Edwards shows a bit of intellectual ambition. But how in the world are Christians going to operate in a world where the most respected newspapers, magazines, and publishers are places where believers will not tread for fear of being challenged? And people think the Left is responsible for the polarization of our society. Challies provides just one more way for Christians to isolate themselves.
Ding!
LikeLike
The demand that I make of my reader is that he should devote his whole Life to reading my works. James Joyce
LikeLike
Good friends, good books and a sleepy conscience: this is the ideal life. Mark Twain
LikeLike
Affinity for Edwards may belie a certain intellectual ambition, but surely the New Cals affinity for memes, images, charts, infographics, and graphic quotes points to a basic, pandering shallowness aka evangelical pragmatism.
LikeLike
There is no such thing as a moral or an immoral book. Books are well written, or badly written. Oscar Wilde
LikeLike
For these you will need to exercise a bit more caution. Here I refer to IVP, Eerdmans… Indeed.
http://www.eerdmans.com/Products/7344/damning-words.aspx
LikeLiked by 1 person
C-dubs, don’t forget the affinity for religious celebrity. And bragging rights.
LikeLike
Instead of iron sharpening iron it’s pillow softening pillow.
Amen DG. Oh wait, you weren’t talking about a few here.
(A different) Dan says: Ding!
Ding, Mr Dan? You mean to –
“familiarize yourself with trustworthy authors-the short list of people you regard as especially influential and trustworthy.”
“familiarize yourself with Christian publishers and learn which of them are especially trustworthy.”
LikeLike
There are safe spaces and there are (not) safe spaces.
LikeLike
cwl, Mencken via Hart from Eerdmans? Hide the women and children and maybe even the trans.
LikeLike
Well, at least he didn’t recommend Canon Press. So there’s that.
LikeLiked by 1 person
LikeLike
Maybe it’s not hate. Maybe it’s a case of loved less.
LikeLike
Ali, the Ding was for this “Challies provides just one more way for Christians to isolate themselves.”‘ Was in a hurry, no time for any extended discussion, or expression of wonderment as to why Calvinists of any description are scared of books. Thought that was the province of us dumb Baptists.
LikeLike
This is particularly interesting to me as an author. I just published a book on Michelangelo with Chicago Review Press so I am not going to please every follower of this list. I’ll see what comes of it.
LikeLiked by 1 person
What is being advocated by Challies–the end of his name, like the name Phillies, indicates there is more than one of him–is simply an example of authoritarianism. I know some who follow Keller independent of Challies’ advice. They only look to trusted Christian authors to understand the world around them. They are insular and confident in what they think they know. But I should add that this dependence on authoritarianism extends past the people mentioned in this blogpost. Itt’s a battle that most religiously conservative Christians either fight against or surrender to.
LikeLike
And the old Calvinism was not about authority? Not about the real presence being local presence, so you can’t get the grace unless you go to the place where sacerdotalist hands will give it to you http://paulhelmsdeep.blogspot.com/2016/06/an-elbow-in-kingdom.html
LikeLike
We all do this all the time. Challies seems a little to cautious, yes, but really…we can’t expect all lay people to have the discernment of academics. Nothing wrong with gravitating towards what you like. And you have to have some road guards unless you have a rich family to pay for leave time while you convalesce and recuperate from wipeouts. As for Eerdmans and IVP, he is quite right, and it is more than a little a shame that houses formerly of strong orthodox credentials have so diluted their output with religious multiculturalism.
LikeLike
“…we can’t expect all lay people to have the discernment of academics.”
This reasoning has always baffled. First, there are non-academics who have discernment (some even more than academics). Second, why indulge the low standard and let bubble-making go? Why not instead raise the standard among the faithful of whatever background to pursue discernment? it’s like saying that because a child likes the shallow end he should be allowed to stay there as long as he wants instead of being encouraged to graduate to the deep end. After a while, doesn’t a grown man look pretty silly flopping around in his water wings? Plus what Paul says about milk and meat.
LikeLike
Zrim,
Ding, ding, ding. And as a rule, I would say modern academics, at least in the liberal arts, have less discernment than non-academics.
LikeLike
Zrim and Joe, it brings to mind the tension between the pietist’s paradigm of the conversion narrative vs. the confessional/biblical paradigm of discipleship. Or, even Calvin’s idea of being ‘converted’ through the course of one’s life.
LikeLike
Zrim,
I see your point, but I don’t find the opposing view so baffling. There are laypeople in the pews, particularly those coming out of shallow evangelicalism, who could use the help of being pointed in the right direction when reading theology. I certainly benefited at some point many years ago from pastors, friends, blogs (the Confessional Outhouse anyone?) etc., who implicitly or explicitly made suggestions. That’s not quite the same thing as creating a safe space for people to indulge their intellectual laziness.
LikeLike
Biblical support for pillow softening pillow?
LikeLike
mboss, I’m not talking about helping a child get his feet wet in the shallow end. That makes sense. I mean staying put there over time because the deep end has perceived dangers, which is what Challies’ type of advice (which is ubiquitous) comes across as. It’s coddling and pietistic.
LikeLike
@Darryl,
Thanks for the link. That’s interesting. I wonder how many idioms in Proverbs and other wisdom literature we take for granted and yet get exactly wrong. Maybe there is a place for scholarship in exegesis after all!
LikeLike
Sean says: brings to mind the tension between the pietist’s paradigm of the conversion narrative vs. the confessional/biblical paradigm of discipleship. Or, even Calvin’s idea of being ‘converted’ through the course of one’s life.
not sure what you are saying, sean ; no reply necessary since it wasn’t to me; nonetheless, just stating it is perplexing
LikeLike
Zrim,
No disagreement there.
LikeLike
Ali, how about experiential vs. discipleship? Or closing the deal(walking an aisle) vs. catechism? These emphasis tend toward contrary means and ends. Excited state vs. sobriety. Emotional commitment vs. deliberate conclusions.
LikeLike
Ali, how about experiential vs. discipleship? Or closing the deal(walking an aisle) vs. catechism? These emphasis tend toward contrary means and ends. Excited state vs. sobriety. Emotional commitment vs. deliberate conclusions.
Thanks for the response sean, still not sure completely what you are saying -perhaps you could be more impartial, fair, and clear.
Anyway, whatever metaphor you might prefer …iron sharpening iron…. pillows softening pillows ….. wounding or kissing, etc, it all agrees that we are in the business of standing firm and striving together for the faith of the gospel and are growing up in the grace and knowledge, in all aspects, into our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ, together. Right?
LikeLike
Ali, what’s right?
LikeLike
Ali, it’s confessionalism versus pietism: Jesus the Son at the right hand of God the Father versus in my heart; Jesus as the maker of good things like beer versus Jesus is better than beer; Jesus as Lord and Savior versus my boyfriend and cosmic pal.
LikeLike
If you read outside the acceptable sources (even listen to NPR), you know that the Genevose Syndrome is no longer in play:
So why apply this to the church?
LikeLike
Ali, it’s confessionalism versus pietism: Jesus the Son at the right hand of God the Father versus in my heart; Jesus as the maker of good things like beer versus Jesus is better than beer; Jesus as Lord and Savior versus my boyfriend and cosmic pal.
Thanks or the proof text opportunity Zrim 🙂
AND….He is in our hearts, is the maker of all good things to enjoy, and is our friend.
-the Lord grant you to be strengthened with power so that Christ may dwell in your hearts through faith, Eph 3:15-17
-Every good thing given and every perfect gift is from above James 1:17
– No longer do I call you slaves but I have called you friends. John 15: 15
LikeLike
Darryl, because it’s an extrovert’s church where greasy familiarity reigns and the Genevose Syndrome serves as a useful way to buttress.
But if confessional introverts are willing to read mainliners, they might be able to sort out that nagging disconnect.
http://www.amazon.com/Introverts-Church-Finding-Extroverted-Culture/dp/0830837027/191-3443843-1069940?ie=UTF8&*Version*=1&*entries*=0
LikeLike
Ali, there are friends and there is Facebook; there are hearts and there is subjectivism; there are personal testimonies and there are personal histories. Do you know the differences? They’re pretty important.
LikeLike
Zrim, Ali, there are friends and there is Facebook; there are hearts and there is subjectivism; there are personal testimonies and there are personal histories. Do you know the differences? They’re pretty important.
huh Zrim? But I’ll agree there are many important things, some for this am….
1) salvation belongs to the Lord; 2) people can draw near with words and honor God with lip service but have hearts far from Him
Is that some of what you’re trying to say?
have a great day
LikeLike
Ali, I don’t understand. Habla Ingles?
LikeLike
Ali, nope.
LikeLike
Zrim, did you review that book at Outhouse?
LikeLike
I call it more spot lighting…
https://confessionalouthouse.wordpress.com/2010/09/16/introverts-of-the-world-and-church-unite/
LikeLike
…than reviewing
https://confessionalouthouse.wordpress.com/2010/12/22/when-sociability-is-mistaken-for-spirituality/
LikeLike
Zrim, got it.
LikeLike