Why does this description of Islam sound familiar?
So I think ISIS is a wakeup call for all Muslims, especially Islamists who see no problem in mixing religion with politics. You want sharia? You want Islam to “conquer” and “dominate”? This is what you get. And when you say, “No, no, that is not real Islam,” you easily become the “apostate” of the “real Islam” that the other guys believe in.
Look at how this works for 2k and neo-Calvinism:
So I think
ISIStheonomy is a wakeup call for allMuslimsCalvinists, especiallyIslamiststransformationalists who see no problem in mixing religion with politics. You wantshariathe Bible? You wantIslamChrist to “conquer” and “dominate” every square inch? This is what you get. And when you say, “No, no, that is not realIslamCalvinism,”you2 kingdoms easily become the “apostate” of the “realIslamCalvinism” that the other guys believe in.
Seems a bit too simplistic in that it only recognizes extremists on one end of Islam while it portrays the two positions in Christianity as being extremist. In addition, regarding the degree control being sought, can we really say all transformationalists are the Christian equivalent of ISIS?
LikeLike
Curt, how about hard (theos) and soft (neos) transformationalists? And does it help to say that, in the same way Baptists don’t actually treat their kids in accord with what their sacramentology entails (like little pagans), hard and soft transformers don’t actually live the way their ecclesiology entails (take over)? Both live like more like paedos and 2kers respectively, so the point is to just get their theology in line with their practice. Getting their practice in line with their theology, not so much.
LikeLike
Zrim,
If you are drawing parallels between 2kers and NeoCalvinist (soft transformationalists), I can at least partially agree. Should note that neither 2kers nor NeoCalvinists believe that the Church as an institution should speak out and challenge the state on state sins. As for your reference to paedos, not sure what you meant.
LikeLike
Curt, the point had to do with theory and practice–if neos and theos live like 2kers (as in living among as opposed to taking over) then why so pushbacky on 2k?
But the difference between soft and hard transformers is one without a difference and 2k stands as a differentiated alternative to both.
To the extant that the CRC is a soft transformationalist denom, the take over strategy is more subtle and persuasive.
https://www.crcna.org/welcome/beliefs/position-statements
A 2k church wouldn’t be as given to commenting on various social issues and would further wonder why the list is so short–surely if every square inch is to be redeemed by the organic church then there are many more issues in the wide world which need addressing.
LikeLike
zrim, Dutch-style development of doctrine:
LikeLike
And Terrible Greg is a 1928 man. 1966 was the beginning of the slide into the absolute moral cesspool of compromised Calvinism from which only a small beginning of a pure remnant remains.
LikeLike
Zrim,
Because no neos are conversing with me about their approach to things. Their approach follows the key-kid philogophy that Young Life, a high school parachurch ministry, at least used to use. You target key kids and if they show an interest, hopefully more kids will follow than if you just evangelized at random. In the end, neither the Neos nor the 2kers support the idea of the Church, as an institution, preaching to the state.
LikeLike
Penetrating theory DH. I lived it. Got my head cracked in the PCA by Mr TR Recon, then jumped ship to the OPC to get busted again by a Neo-Calvinist contingency. Won’t go into the details, but confirmed the theory proposed in practice. It’s the many faced earth-bound Esau intruding into the heavenly delights of Isaac and Jacob. So far, apart from some rumblings from the Mid-West, I have found safe haven with 2K convictions in the URC. But maybe I’m just naive about my “live and let live” notions. Anyway, your little word swaps I found scintillating.
LikeLike
Curt, right but so? The neos still want the Council to sign the petition against the strip club going up while still pussy-footing around with the member who has had her third child out of wedlock and wants the latest baptized and a chunk of change for the Christian school bill (real life example of this 2ker among the neos). The 2ker would rather the church refrain from being obnoxious, mind her own business and leave her members to live in the world without being of it.
The point is that while neos and 2kers might share a bit in common against the theos, there remains significant differences between the former two. What’s your point?
LikeLike
Like I said:
LikeLike
The Supreme Court’s 2000 coup for W and against Gore saved this country
http://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/ataturk-versus-erdogan-turkeys-long-struggle
LikeLike