How Far Will They Go to Blame Kuyper?

This just isn’t fair:

From the first Mass in the Sistine chapel until today, Pope Francis’ liturgical [lack of] effort and administrative initiatives reflect a resurgence of the neo-Calvinism that swept the French Church during the Counter-Reformation and the Liturgical Movement in the 20th century. Jorge Bergoglio is the first pope since the fifth century not to celebrate some variation of the old Ordo Missae. He was ordained two weeks after the new Ordo superseded the modified 1965 Ordo. He was educated during the worst period in the history of the Society of Jesus. And among his predecessors, the one he most quotes is Paul VI. The current pontificate has become a parody of the worst of neo-Calvinism and the tragedy of Pope Hamlet.

The inevitable appointment of Msgr. Piero Marini to the Congregation for Divine Worship, the removal of Cardinals Burke and Llovera, the promotion of the Kasper doctrine, and the immunity of Cardinal Dolan in New York all converge into a strange neo-Calvinism, one far worse than the Jansenism of the 18th century. This reductionism removes all trappings, customs, images, and sounds of beauty and depth of the faith, again exposing the bear minimum. This time, the reduction is not part of a misguided pastoral attempt at getting the faithful to respond to Dominus vobiscum. This is a political attempt to remove anything in the Church bothersome to “the world” out there. It means the removal of laws, liturgical practices, vestments, discipline, and sensibility. We will be left with the Bible, the [ignored] Catechism, a reformed Missal, and a smile. We know what the Pope wants in the immediate run: Communion for those no longer living their proper marriages. It would not be wrong to ponder what he wants next, beyond this obstacle. What will be the next vestige of “self-absorbed promethean neo-pelagianism” to be cast aside so as to show the world that we are not really that scary or serious after all?

3 thoughts on “How Far Will They Go to Blame Kuyper?

  1. That quotation reveals a lot about what the author of it realy values about the RCC! Amused at the notion that Kuyper is the power behind Francis’s throne.

    Like

  2. Awesome blog, RadTrad. Esp the comments section.

    http://theradtrad.blogspot.com/2014/09/neo-calvinism-in-catholic-church.html?showComment=1411569519666

    Your alternate reality/mirror image, Darryl, a rabbinical Catholic were there no rabbinical Calvinists left. There are no other extant alternatives, save the EOs or non-Reform Judaism. Props.

    “Jason and the Callers” are your foils, but it’s RadTrad that’s the other side of your coin. Rock on, Bristol. This gets better and better.

    Like

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.