-
Recent Comments
- Richard Smith on Does Jonathan Edwards Need Paul Tripp?
- Nick Mackison on Does Jonathan Edwards Need Paul Tripp?
- Jack Miller on Faint Resemblance
- Nick Mackison on Does Jonathan Edwards Need Paul Tripp?
- Richard Smith on Does Jonathan Edwards Need Paul Tripp?
- Richard Smith on Does Jonathan Edwards Need Paul Tripp?
- Richard Smith on Does Jonathan Edwards Need Paul Tripp?
- Nick Mackison on Does Jonathan Edwards Need Paul Tripp?
- dsanger on Does Jonathan Edwards Need Paul Tripp?
- Richard Smith on Does Jonathan Edwards Need Paul Tripp?
Categories
- 2006
- Adventures in Church History
- Application of Redemption
- Because Someone Has to Provide Oversight
- Being Human
- Book of Nature
- Christ and culture
- Christian politics
- Confessionalism
- Cornelius Van Til
- Evangelicalism
- Featured
- Forensics
- General Revelation
- J. Gresham Machen
- Jure Divino Presbyterianism
- Lordship of Christ
- Miscellany
- Neo-Calvinism
- Neo-Protestantism
- New World Presbyterianism
- Nicotine Theological Journal
- Novus Ordo Seclorum
- Old World Presbyterianism
- Orthodox Presbyterian Church
- Paleo Calvinism
- Piety with Excitement
- Piety without Exuberance
- sanctification
- Second Hand Smoke
- Shameless Selves Promotion
- Shock and Awe
- spirituality of the church
- The Hinge
- The Sacred Office
- The Wax Nose
- Wendell Berry
- Westminster
- Wilderness Wanderings
“Horton is completely wrong in his definition of the Gospelâ€
That is Mark Horne’s charitable and cautious verdict of Mike Horton’s remarks about the Manhattan Declaration. Horton’s offense was to write this: “This declaration continues this tendency to define ‘the gospel’as something other than the specific announcement of the forgiveness of sins and declaration of righteousness solely by Christ’s merits.†But Horne will have none… Read More→