-
Recent Comments
- Scott Pierce on Does Jonathan Edwards Need Paul Tripp?
- Richard Smith on Does Jonathan Edwards Need Paul Tripp?
- Nick Mackison on Does Jonathan Edwards Need Paul Tripp?
- Jack Miller on Faint Resemblance
- Nick Mackison on Does Jonathan Edwards Need Paul Tripp?
- Richard Smith on Does Jonathan Edwards Need Paul Tripp?
- Richard Smith on Does Jonathan Edwards Need Paul Tripp?
- Richard Smith on Does Jonathan Edwards Need Paul Tripp?
- Nick Mackison on Does Jonathan Edwards Need Paul Tripp?
- dsanger on Does Jonathan Edwards Need Paul Tripp?
Categories
- 2006
- Adventures in Church History
- Application of Redemption
- Because Someone Has to Provide Oversight
- Being Human
- Book of Nature
- Christ and culture
- Christian politics
- Confessionalism
- Cornelius Van Til
- Evangelicalism
- Featured
- Forensics
- General Revelation
- J. Gresham Machen
- Jure Divino Presbyterianism
- Lordship of Christ
- Miscellany
- Neo-Calvinism
- Neo-Protestantism
- New World Presbyterianism
- Nicotine Theological Journal
- Novus Ordo Seclorum
- Old World Presbyterianism
- Orthodox Presbyterian Church
- Paleo Calvinism
- Piety with Excitement
- Piety without Exuberance
- sanctification
- Second Hand Smoke
- Shameless Selves Promotion
- Shock and Awe
- spirituality of the church
- The Hinge
- The Sacred Office
- The Wax Nose
- Wendell Berry
- Westminster
- Wilderness Wanderings
If You Can’t Say Something Nice . . .
Who says Old Lifers can never say anything good about theonomists? Here is evidence that says they can. Granted, the kind words stem from comparisons among theonomy, terrorism, and a certain strain of the Left — sort of like being damned by faint praise. Even so, we can all be thankful that theonomists are not… Read More→