As much as Old Life gives grief to neo-Calvinists, readers should not take this criticism as a kind of ethnocentrism in reverse against the Dutch. In fact, in the temporal kingdom, the Netherlands has many attractions. And the history of the Low Countries is fascinating if not inspiring in ways that Abraham Kuyper presented it.
Here’s proof. I am teaching a seminar this fall on place and home and am assigning Witold Rybczynski’s very good book, Home: The History of an Idea. This astute architectural historian, who used to be my neighbor back in Philadelphia, devotes an entire chapter to the Dutch home and its importance for the history of domestication. He begins the chapter this way (and look, mom, Calvinists hands are tied behind Dutch backs):
The United Provinces of the Netherlands was a brand-new state, formed in 1609 after thirty years of rebellion against Spain. It was among the smallest countries in Europe, with a population one-quarter that of Spain, one-eighth that of France, and with a landmass smaller than Switzerland’s. It had few natural resources — no mines, no forests — and what little land there was needed constant protection from the sea. But this “low” country surprisingly quickly established itself as a major power. In a short time it became the most advanced shipbuilding nation in the world and developed large naval, fishing, and merchant fleets. Its explorers founded colonies in Africa and Asia, as well as in America. The Netherlands introduced many financial innovations that made it a major economic force — and Amsterdam became the world center for international finance. Its manufacturing towns grew so quickly that by the middle of the century the Netherlands had supplanted France as the leading industrial nation of the world. Its universities were among the best in Europe; its tolerant political and religious climate offered a home for emigre thinkers such as Spinoza, Descartes, and John Locke. This fecund country produced not just venture capitalists and the speculative tulip trade, but also Rembrandt and Vermeer; it devised not only the first recorded war game, but also the first microscope; it invested not only in heavily armed East Indiamen but also in beautiful towns. All this occurred during a brief historical moment — barely a human lifetime — which lasted from 1609 until roughly the 1660s, and which the Dutch call their “golden age.” (51-52).
I think D.G.’s application for a faculty position at Calvin must be in the mail…
LikeLike
@ Eric Charter: LOL!
LikeLike
There must be something in in that Michigan water. Hillsdale is downstream from Grand Rapids, right?
LikeLike
He forgot to mention Johannes Cocceius, whose life almost perfectly tracks the Golden Age. Coincidence?
(So what, Cocceius was born in Bremen… he taught in Franeker and Leiden)
LikeLike
I was reading Ahlstrom yesterday and he was saying that one of the reasons the Dutch settlement in New York didn’t really take off was that not many people wanted to leave The Netherlands. English opposition to Dutch claims was also a factor. This is the segment that became the RCA. The group that came over roughly 150 years later (in the 1840’s, I believe) soon became the CRC.
LikeLike
Rybczynski is one of my favorite authors. Why am I not surprised you two are pals? He wrote an entire book on the screw, you know.
LikeLike
Brad, WR is an amazing historian. Some day, when I grow up, I hope to be like him.
LikeLike