First it was smoking. I grew up in a fundamentalist home where smoking was off limits. I have also related the story of how devastated I was when I first saw Richie (later Dick) Allen smoking in the Phillies’ dugout. But now the world has turned into the Hart home (of my parents). Thankfully, the missus tolerates an occasional cigar indoors. But everywhere else in “the worldly world,” I can’t smoke (at least indoors). Not even women, who have absolute sovereignty over their bodies in the pro-choice world, may light up indoors. When will that barrier to human freedom topple?
Now it is language. The worldly worldlings are as worried about speech and its power to hurt as my fundamentalist fellow believers were about four-letter words and references to sex or body parts. The desire to make the world a tolerant and liberated place has now extended to Princeton University where students are objecting both to associations between the institution and its former president, Woodrow Wilson, but also to the word — wait for it — “master.” (Will Princeton stop granting “Masters” degrees?)
The group Black Justice League occupied the office of President Christopher L. Eisgruber at Princeton and offered a series of demands: that the university “acknowledge the racist legacy of Woodrow Wilson and how he impacted campus policy and culture,” and that all buildings and programs named for Wilson have their names changed. The students also demanded that a portrait of Wilson come down from a dining hall. Other demands include having “classes on the history of marginalized peoples” be added to distribution requirements, and that a “cultural space on campus” be “dedicated specifically to black students.”
Also on Wednesday, the masters of Princeton’s residential colleges decided to stop calling themselves masters and instead to use the term “head of the college.”
At protests at Yale University, minority students have said that the word “master” is associated with slavery in ways that make it an inappropriate title for a college official.
Princeton’s announcement of the change noted that the use of “master” in the sense of an academic leader predates American slavery and has nothing to do with it.
“Though we are aware that the term ‘master’ has a long history of use in universities (indeed since medieval times), it seems to me by now to be anachronistic and unfortunate for the positions we hold,” said a statement from Sandra Bermann, head of Whitman College, Cotsen Professor of the Humanities and professor of comparative literature. “We are glad to take on the designation as ‘head of the college’ that describes our role more aptly.”
My forebears would have put “head” in Margaret Gray’s “filth file” because of its phalic associations. But everyone knows that contemporary fundamentalists give a pass to sex.
Perhaps the oddest part of this story was the following comment:
“We owe nothing to people who are deeply flawed,” the essay says. “There is an impulsive reaction to want to ignore uncomfortable or questionable legacies. However, what does it say about our society if we continue to glorify legacies without acknowledging — and at the very least caring about — the continuous promotion of unrectified inequalities and injustices? … By not recognizing the importance of this discourse, the university is telling its marginalized community and the outside world that it values its bleached-clean version of history over the prolonged discomfort and alienation of students of color. This erasure is especially dangerous in the present context of state-sanctioned violence against black people that prolongs this genocide.”
Actually, everyone owes a debt to our deeply flawed first parents, which is what we call original sin. But today’s self-righteous never recognize their own flaws or the possibility that they may have them.
And forget about all that outrage over Islamist attacks on Charlie Hebdo for its iconoclastic and blasphemous covers. The self-righteous, whether believers or tolerantists, cannot abide sin in this world.
Wait, maybe Fosdick won after all.
Children of Finney right and left, BJU and Oberlin. Nothing new under the gospel-centered sun.
LikeLike
So long as the boomers are saddled with being the most self-indulgent, entitled and still in my way, I can own that my own brilliance, performance and expectation of others is sometimes more than they can bear.
LikeLike
Window fan to exhaust the smoke – $33. Pipes and cigars with friends in the house throughout the winter, priceless.
LikeLike
I need to get me one of those.
LikeLike
I wonder what Anthony Bradley would say. I can imagine what Glenn Loury would:
LikeLike
“Master” is derived from magister, “teacher”. Will orchestras survive with the “maestro” intact? Will sailors now go to the “master” to relieve themselves?
LikeLike
As a teen. I had pigeons named Magister and Volo.
That is all.
LikeLike
Back in those days we’d get wasted then decline. Like an intellectually stimulating teenage wasteland.
LikeLike
You had pigeons.
LikeLike
Please continue.
LikeLike
Some we took from nests under bridges and also bought some fancy pigeons. The one I named pugno (or some form of it) was hand trained but he’d peck the heck out of my hand. The fantails eventually got decimated by a new cat next door. To some I was the Birdman of Yarmouth. I couldn’t tell if they liked listening to Deep Purple.
LikeLike
Money handed over for pigeons. Others were ‘rescued’.
LikeLike
Stolen, not rescued.
The fantails were eye catchers but the Swiss Mondaines were more regal and powerful in flight.
LikeLike
Other demands include having “classes on the history of marginalized peoples” be added to distribution requirements…
I’ll be looking forward to the class on Old School Presbyterianism.
LikeLike
Pigeons regal and powerful in flight…………………………………until the red tail hawk shows up to display what regal and powerful looks like?
Pigeons with eye catching fantails. What kind of drugs were these?
LikeLike
Also on Wednesday, the masters of Princeton’s residential colleges decided to stop calling themselves masters and instead to use the term head of the college.
Will no one stand up for the feet?
And in other news, a reading of Vonnegut’s Harrison Bergeron was cancelled.
LikeLike
I’ve seen a red tailed hawk tear open a pigeon. That was kind of regal in a tooth and claw way. Or talon and beak fashion.
LikeLike
sean – I actually had a red tailed hawk in high school – trained it for falconry. You know, cuz the ladies love falconry.
LikeLike
So, high school around here was pigeons and falconry. Was this like a rennaisance fair kind of thing? Did y’all wear knee stockings and flat caps and embroidered leather vests? I remember the homeschoolers showing up in knickers and blouses and those were the guys. So, I guess like that but drugs too.
LikeLike
sean -Ha! We were more like hunting, muscle cars, and Rush. Maybe a hint of renaissance fair, but definitely no knee stockings and flat caps. That was for the Baptists – and the cockneys.
LikeLike
I love it when Muddy hijacks a post with stories of pigeon (fan) tails.
LikeLike
This is why some of us would rather not exercise a “vocation” to direct history in the right direction.
“You’re a Christian – I mean, you can prove you’re a Christian,” Bush said, “If you can’t prove it, then, you know, you err on the side of caution.”
Rupert Murdoch—supporting refugees who are “proven Christians.”
Laura Ingraham– welcome some refugees, if we can verifiably say they are Christians.
Matthew J. Tuininga—As anyone familiar with Darryl Hart’s excellent work on Machen is aware, Machen’s view of the connection between Christianity and politics was profoundly different from that of Wilson. Machen, says Hart, sought to distinguish the gospel from theories of political transformation.
http://www.patheos.com/Evangelical/Wilson-Calvinist-Wrong-Matthew-Tuininga-12-17-2012
LikeLike
One of the most interesting histories of American evangelicalism I have read is Less Than Conquerors by Douglas Franks. He suggests that dispensationalism and “prosperity positive thinking” were reactions to fundamentalist losses. But in the subtext, there is this fear that maybe the fundamentalists have not lost (yet).
When we think of Woodrow Wilson, I think the last word should go to Richard Gamble.
http://www.theamericanconservative.com/articles/wilsonian-slaughter/
LikeLike
Would the League recommend that I write my alma mater and have my “master’s” degree changed to something different? Maybe something along the lines of the old joke?:
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=college+degrees
The ridiculous nature of these PC naming convention protests goes back several decades. I recall similar outcry while working in the telecom/electronics field during the 80’s revolving around the use of “master” and “slave” to describe the hierarchy of reference frequency clocks in digital carrier systems.
Don’t these people have something more important to worry about?
LikeLike
George, and imagine the problem of BA.
LikeLike
I was in college four years ago and none of this ever happened.
LikeLike
All blame must go to middle-aged white male land owners. Get whitey.
LikeLike
The seems like hollow victories. After all, fundamentalists are still more defined by personality type than by what they believe
LikeLike
http://www.the-american-interest.com/2015/11/22/holy-nation-america-born-again/
LikeLike
old Princeton did not segregate out enough of those new school guys
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/11/25/opinion/the-case-against-woodrow-wilson-at-princeton.html?_r=0
LikeLike
This is why good history majors are needed more than ever. Soon like Hitler’s Germany and Stalin’s Russia and Kim’s North Korea, true history will be erased and a fanciful past universe will be erected to replace it.
LikeLike
Turkey is becoming Eastern California:
LikeLike
“Worldly worldlings” are not worried about war. Sure, liberals really would like to include everybody, because before Woodrow Wilson was for the war to keep everybody from ever again needing to die for anything, Woodrow Wilson was also against the war. And if Tim Keller has the serenity of Niebuhr to “take what’s realistic to take”, there is no need for a “warrior antithesis” which says no to the world. As long as wars for liberalism are not engaged in the name of Jesus, why not keep your strong sectarian opinions as private as possible?
http://www.theamericanconservative.com/articles/the-bitter-fruits-of-wilsonianism/
LikeLike