Making Excuses

After reading defenses of the Crusades, this account of the Renaissance papacy by Eamon Duffy caught my eye.

First the bad:

The Renaissance papacy evokes images of a Hollywood spectacular, all decadence and drag. Contemporaries viewed Renaissance Rome as we now view Nixon’s Washington, a city of expense-account whores and political graft, where everything and everyone had a price, where nothing and nobody could be trusted. The popes themselves seemed to set the tone. Alexander VI (1492-1503) flaunted a young and nubile mistress in the Vatican, was widely believed to have made a habit of poisoning his cardinals so as to get his hand on their property, and he ruthlessly aggrandized his illegitimate sons and daughters a the Church’s expense. Julius II (1503-1513), inspired patron of Raphael, Bramante, Michelangelo and Leonardo, was a very dubious Father of all the Faithful, for he had fathered three daughters of his own while a cardinal, and he was a feocious and enthusiastic warrior, dressing in silver papal armour and leading his own troops through the breaches blown in the city walls of towns who resisted his authority. . . .

Papal audacity, indeed.

But just as the Crusades might qualify as a defensive omelet that required breaking eggs, so the excesses of the Renaissance popes were part of a package to restore the glories of Rome:

All this presents a luridly one-sided picture of the Renaissance popes. It takes no account of the massive task of reconstruction which confronted the papacy in the wake of the Great Schism. The popes of the later fifteenth century had to reinvent Rome. . . . Rome had no industries except pilgrimage, no function except as the Pope’s capital. The city and its churches were radically impoverished by the long absence of the popes in Avignon. . . . The Renaissance popes were determined to change all that, and set about planning new streets and raising buildings to perpetuate their own and their families’ names, buildings which would be worthy both of the centre of the Church and of the greatest of all earthly cities, the mother of Europe. The fifteenth and early sixteenth centuries in Rome were the age of Humanism, a great age of renewed classical learning, the rediscovery of the principles of classical art, the flowering of creativity in painting, sculpture and architecture, and of a delight in life and beauty which represented not just lavish extravagance, but a renewed sense of the glory of creation. (Saints and Sinners, 133-34)

All better, then.

But who am I to judge since I benefited last summer from all that papal spending?

Even so, this period in papal history makes you wonder about Michael Sean Winter’s assessment of Vatican II, when the church went from being parochial to engaging the wider world:

Recognizing the dominant dualism of Christian spiritual history, which saw the world as bad or at least tainted and the Church as holy and undefiled, they Council Fathers could not turn their back on that history, but they needed to expand it. The authors write: “The dualistic opposition to the world, the patronizing diminishment of those who are called to marriage and family life, and the disparagement of those who serve in politics, art, education, technology, etc. (the works of the world), must be set aside as Church leaders seek to understand that God dwells precisely within the world both through the Church and in the creation itself. Service to the world is the mission of God for which Jesus was sent, and for which the Church was called and developed.” This expanded understanding of the theological significance of “the world” does not mean we cannot all recognize, and recoil from, a “worldly” cleric, nor get nervous when some neo-Gnostic confuses the natural and supernatural realms. But, this expanded understanding of the world mirrored the expanded ecclesiology of the Council, recognizing that it is baptism, not only ordination, that confers upon all the faithful, most of whom work in the world, the tasks the Jesus entrusted to the Church.

Is it just me or did the Renaissance popes look like they were fairly engaged with the affairs of the world? And might not a case be made that reform is still needed?

Advertisements

6 thoughts on “Making Excuses

  1. Who I am to judge, yo?

    In contrast to cats on the feet of roman statues, (OLTS’s own CWU somehow got a leaked photograph of our HQ (wasn’t me)), I’m worried about the feral cats living underneath, the cinder blocks won’t hold much longer..

    Like

  2. I prefer the old Popes like Julius and Alexander. They were real men, real sinners, maybe real saints too. Alexander improved Italy immensely in ways that matter to common citizens.

    Clericalism wasn’t at issue, IMO, just good old fashioned authoritarianism.

    When Alexander died, the curial pall bearers got into a argument, dropped the casket and began sword fighting. Only in Rome.

    Like

  3. The Crusades had some flaws, Islam has way more:

    It was indeed shameful for the president to link the Crusades with the current slaughter of tens of thousands of Christians by Islamic killers because the Crusades were a defensive war against Muslim jihadists who, for 450 years, had been slaughtering Christians while waging an offensive war against Jerusalem and other holy places where Jesus had walked. One historian calculates that the Muslims fought more than 500 battles in the centuries leading up to the Crusades, while the Crusades fought only a few dozen battles in two centuries.

    For the record, the Crusaders may have been responsible for thousands of deaths between 1095 and 1291, but the Islamic jihadists have been responsible for the deaths of some 270 million persons since Mohammed launched his war in the seventh century on all those who don’t believe in Allah.

    From the time of St. Paul in the first century to the birth of Mohammed in AD 570, Christians had spread the teachings of Christ peacefully throughout the Middle East, North Africa, and southern Europe.

    Christian missionaries were men of peace and prayer and not military warriors. They did not spread violence, but were often the victims of violence, and many are recognized today as martyrs for laying down their lives for Christ. If you thought there were a lot of martyrs in the first few centuries of the Church’s existence, know that more Christians have been killed for their faith in the past century than in the previous 19 centuries combined.

    Within 200 years of Mohammed’s death in 632, however, Muslims had overrun all those Christian lands around the Mediterranean with the sword. They were following the command of their founder “to fight all men until they say, ‘There is no god but Allah’.” And, strikingly, Mohammed’s marauders committed the same atrocities back then as their successors are committing today — beheading captives, burning them to death, and crucifying them.

    Like

  4. It’s always darkest before the kool aid:

    I know that many of us have had the wind knocked out of our sails a bit by the fairly grim figures of the new Pew Study. But nothing that Pew found was not entirely predictable. I actually *had* predicted it 5 years ago and talked about these realities endlessly in my old blog. (For my readership of three people, one of whom was probably looking for Amy Welborn!) But it is different to see it in black and white. But all we have lost are the remnants of our illusions.

    The great Catholic revival and the generation of saints in early 17th century France emerged from circumstances vastly grimmer than this. 8 religious civil wars in 32 years. 20 percent of the population of Paris died in a religiously-fueled siege. Finally, two generations after Trent, the exhausted survivors looked about them and decided to give building something positive a try – collaborating across the generations and categories like bishop, priest, lay man or lay woman.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s