The world is not a safe place.
Even the University of Chicago agrees with Ellen and Jay Hart:
Looking for safe spaces on campus or trigger warnings on a syllabus?
Incoming students at the University of Chicago have been warned they won’t find either in Hyde Park.
They all received a letter recently from John Ellison, dean of students, which went beyond the usual platitudes of such letters and made several points about what he called one of Chicago’s “defining characteristics,” which he said was “our commitment to freedom of inquiry and expression.” Ellison said civility and respect are “vital to all of us,” and people should never be harassed. But he added, “You will find that we expect members of our community to be engaged in rigorous debate, discussion and even disagreement. At times this may challenge you and even cause discomfort.”
To that end, he wrote, “Our commitment to academic freedom means that we do not support so-called trigger warnings, we do not cancel invited speakers because their topics might prove controversial and we do not condone the creation of intellectual safe spaces where individuals can retreat from ideas and perspectives at odds with their own.”
What I (mmmeeeeEEEE) can’t fathom is parents rearing children to expect that the world will be safe. I thought this was the age of the helicopter parent, the one who is always worried about something going wrong. Or is it that helicopter parents have been so successful in keeping their children from danger that the kids really do think the world is a safe place, and if it is not something’s wrong?
That’s why only Gold medals matter. Who taught these kids to be happy with first loser?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Maybe University of Chicago is not a safe space for liberal education:
LikeLiked by 1 person
This certainly doesn’t sound like the UC where the late Allan Bloom taught. I recall reading “The Book Wars: What it Takes to Be Educated in America,” by then NY Times editor James Atlas (1990), when it was published and was astonished to find Bloom arguing in favor of keeping “the classics” on the curriculum vs. other notorious professors and department heads at colleges around the country who were pushing their agendas for substituting “culturally relevant” reading material. Not astonished at Bloom, mind you, but at the major turn in the country’s college educational fabric – if you’re out to seek a good, solid, and (heh) expensive liberal formal eduction, why would you not want to read the classics. ‘Course, the two and half decades since the publication was released have only seen this situation worsen. Maybe UC is just giving up on the whole bad business and taken a sharp turn toward the hard sciences as an escape route (or maybe I should say “safe space).
LikeLike
I went to college figuring I was better than my professors and going to have to overcome them. I was right and I did. “Pay a nickel and make your choice, Mr. Moore!” More imprecision from doctors, I want my nickel back. But you can keep nickelback.
LikeLike