Rah Rah T(eam) G(ospel) C(oalition)

Justin Taylor recommends Richard Lovelace’s pro-revival book, Dynamics of Spiritual Life, and shows the telltale faults of the gospel allies. Taylor praises a book that is more theology than history as a work of church history, and he reproduces endorsements from TGC heavyweights about how important Lovelace’s book was for their ministry and careers:

There is not another book quite like Richard Lovelace’s The Dynamics of Spiritual Life: An Evangelical Theology of Renewal (IVP, 1979).

It was published before Tim Keller and John Piper had written any popular books.

It was written back when Jonathan Edwards was hardly anybody’s homeboy.

It was written by an author who is a bit eccentric, but whose every page—agree or disagree—is worth wrestling with and pondering.

Tim Keller says that if you read this book, you’ll say that you now know where he got all his material. He still thinks we can’t do without this book.

David Powlison says he read the book multiple times in the 1980s.

Ray Ortlund has said that this book is rarely far from his thoughts.

So we have the problem of the veneer of uncontested scholarship followed by the problem of group think. Does anyone challenge Lovelace on historical or theological grounds? Or is Lovelace wonderful all the time because he means so much to TGC celebrities? (I suppose Justin has to adjudicate such questions sometimes as an editor at Crossway books but among TGC eminences such critical perspectives rarely arise.)

I ran a search of Lovelace’s book and discovered that it received no reviews in the standard historical journals (religious or secular). But at Reformed Journal, Mark Noll, then a relatively obscure young scholar, raised precisely the sort of concerns that should have dawned on Taylor, Tim Keller, Ray Ortlund, and David Powlison before praising the book in such glowing ways. Noll’s concerns are also those that confessional Protestants bring to the book:

The more diffuse second half of the book proposes programs for personal and parish renewal, while warning against emotional, spiritual, and theological errors which lead revivals astray. It contends for a faith that neglects neither personal spirituality nor doctrinal orthodoxy nor structural reform. It concludes with a potpourri of concerns pointing out the value to renewed Christians of remaining in their denominations, offering a blueprint for artistic revival among evangelicals, and stressing the need for a socially active faith.

The book attempts so much that it is bound to leave each reader unsatisfied at some points. To quibble, I found it strange that Lovelace would exalt Jonathan Edwards as a flawless model for ongoing spiritual renewal. However influential Edwards’ Narrative of Surprising Conversions was for the Great Awakening of the 1730’s and 1740’s, the message of renewal evidently did not permeate even Edwards’ own Northampton congregation, which dismissed him less than a decade after the flowering of the revival. Also, Lovelace’s repeated contrast between the spiritual vitality of today’s young people and the enculturated sterility of the older generation is naive.

More seriously, Lovelace exhibits a strange lack of concern for “steady state” Christianity. He focuses so intently upon the manifestations of spiritual renewal in local churches, denominations, and society as a whole—his enthusiasm is so great for the rare moments of dramatic spiritual quickening in Christian history—that he neglects what have been the day-in, day-out realities for most Christians in most eras of the church’s history. Work and family life, for instance, receive little attention here Yet if spiritual renewal is to be a sustaining presence in the church at large, it must certainly go beyond what theologians, preachers, denominational officials, and other professional Christian workers do for a living It must even go beyond what lay people do in devotion, worship, witness, and Christian social involvement. One group of Lovelace’s heroes, the Puritans, recognized the need for Christian renewal to remake relationships in the home and workplace. Yet, except for a few brief comments concerning “theological integration,” Lovelace seems content to leave untouched that artificial division between spiritual and secular worlds which has so bedeviled the church. (“Breadth and Longevity,” Nov. 1980)

Is Noll being unnice to suggest that Lovelace promises more than he delivers? Or that steady state Christianity (what some might call confessional Protestantism) is superior to the emotionally laden and earnest evangelicalism that Edwards promoted and for which the gospel allies are nostalgic? Are the gospel allies guilty of the same flaws as Lovelace? Who will compel them to see their weaknesses if critics don’t do it? If they refuse to listen to meanies like Old Life, how about Mark Noll?

Fewer high fives, more sobriety.

Advertisements

12 thoughts on “Rah Rah T(eam) G(ospel) C(oalition)

  1. What tone!

    “There is not another book quite like Richard Lovelace’s The Dynamics of Spiritual Life: An Evangelical Theology of Renewal (IVP, 1979).

    It was published before Tim Keller and John Piper had written any popular books.

    It was written back when Jonathan Edwards was hardly anybody’s homeboy.”

    Why not “The Coalition was without form and void. And darkness was on the face of the evangelicalism…”?

    Like

  2. I bet it wound you up. I’m gonna put it on my list to read this fall.

    As you know, my instinct is to embrace at least some of revivalism (at least in a half-hearted way), but I also frequently find myself frustrated with pieces of Lovelacian theology. I should see if I can maintain this lukewarm position.

    Like

  3. 1. Post picture -please include:
    http://www.bing.com/images/search?q=male+cheerleaders&view=detailv2&&id=B0A078869BDE374A8549FE426DCA91E4805AD6E6&selectedIndex=65&ccid=BqrY%2fTc4&simid=608020864631898284&thid=OIP.M06aad8fd3738e8fa6797f7576db4e195o0&ajaxhist=0

    2. group think accusation of others? Please, I mean please send some OL addresses, so mirrors can be sent.

    3.” emotionally laden and earnest”
    Rejoice always; pray without ceasing; in everything give thanks; 1 Thess 5:16-18NASB
    Rejoice always, pray without ceasing, give thanks in all circumstances. ESV
    Rejoice always, pray continually, give thanks in all circumstances; NIV
    Be cheerful no matter what; pray all the time; thank God no matter what happens. The Message
    Rejoice, pray, thank (when you can fit it in;don’t let it interfere with life; don’t work it up; and maybe best just reserve it for Sunday) OL version

    4. Rejoice always; pray without ceasing; in everything give thanks; 1 Thess 5:16-18
    whoa, wait a minute, context and setting please same OLers

    5Keith Miller says: embrace in a half-hearted way, maintain this lukewarm position.
    ! funny but not really Jesus: Rev 3:16

    Liked by 1 person

  4. Transforming the city continues to ape urban renewal more and more. Went to a groundbreaking for an apt complex on the east side(where you don’t go after dusk) and they had the kickoff brunch in an historic Methodist church and then a RELIGIOUS invocation for the development in which the preacher prayed that foremost this new development would, OF COURSE, bring about justice. Now, for all that’s odd and strange and but a small glimpse into the overlay of economics, urban renewal, SJW theology, politics, and invoking God’s blessing for an apartment building for yuppie millenials, AT LEAST, that apartment development complete with retail space and “affordable housing” for “downtown workforce vocations”(No, I’m not sh$tting you) will do one hell of a lot more for ‘transforming the city” than ANY Redeemer plant ever imagined to do. I want a seat at the big table of Kellerite SJW Inc. I do this better than they can. Plus, I can pull in some old RC religious and get more done then the annual dented food can donation and drive which somehow always litters the FB page as proof of ‘being for the city”.

    Liked by 1 person

  5. DGH, you MUST use the awesome TGC dumpster fire picture that cw l’unificateur posted above. I have been laughing and laughing at it… wow, that’s great!

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s