Andrew Ferguson wonders why Eerdmans would include an entry in its American religious biography series on H. L. Mencken:
The co-editor of the series, the church historian Mark A. Noll, raises the question in his foreword: “Whatever could have led Darryl Hart, himself the author of several worthy books patiently explaining the virtues of historical Calvinism, to think that any one at all could be interested in a religious biography of H.L. Mencken?”
A few pages later, the author himself wonders the same thing. After ticking off Mencken’s many admirable qualities—his productivity as a journalist, his fearlessness as a magazine editor, his unfailing humor, his tough-mindedness—Mr. Hart asks: “What does any of this have to do with religion? Why should Mencken qualify for entry in a series of religious biographies?”
I would like to report that the answer Mr. Hart gives to this question is an irrefutable and bold assertion about . . . something or other. But I can’t. For all the book’s virtues—it is charmingly written and comprehensive of its subject—the author struggles to explain why it should have been written at all.
But, for what is Mencken best remembered? The Scopes Trial. What about his attack on Puritanism (“the haunting idea, that someone, somewhere, may be happy”)? And what about his confrontation with the nation’s Protestant-inspired decency laws? Also, what to make of his withering critique of the moral idealism that Woodrow Wilson used to rally the United States to enter a war “to end all wars?”
The point is not that Christianity defined Mencken and that he ironically owed a debt to the believers who bemused him. Instead, taking account of his life makes little sense without noticing how his literary battles with Puritanism, his columns against Prohibition, his pointed coverage of the Scopes Trial, his protracted legal contest with Boston’s Watch and Ward Society, or the book he considered his most important, Treatise, set Mencken apart from his contemporaries, gave him a lot to say along with a large readership that wanted to listen. Christianity and its dominant position in American society was not responsible for producing Mencken. But it was a sufficiently large part of his experience and thought to justify a religious biography. (Damning Words, 4)
If Mencken is best remembered for his opposition to Christianity in its political, cultural, and moral dimensions, then isn’t religion a big part of his life even if he didn’t believe? Christianity framed Mencken. He would not be the man or writer he was without having been surrounded by and pondered Christianity. That makes a religious biography plausible.
9 thoughts on “Christianity Framed Mencken”
An universalist like David Bentley Hart can write about Nietzsche since God in common grace has made everyone a sincere and well-intentioned offer,, but D G Hart is not supposed to write about anti-puritans like Mencken?
Now I am waiting for a religious biography of Upton Sinclair. “It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends upon his not understanding it”
I, Candidate for Governor: And How I Got Licked (1935)
David Bentley Hart—“That Christ ascribes the deepest wellsprings of evil to the heart and its most inward longings in absolutely no way whatever implies that the outward acts of the hands are of so secondary an importance that the clear, explicit, repeated moral commands of the New Testament can be taken as anything other than clear, explicit, repeated moral commands.”
Reblogged this on Talmidimblogging.
I would ask what your thesis is (pace Noll), but I’m pretty sure you would direct me to Amazon….
LikeLiked by 1 person
Not that this is of any particularly grave import, but would the work be less worthy, or even different at all, minus the word “religious” as a descriptor?
Jeff, you can also buy directly from Eerdmans.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Just because some disagrees with or even opposes Christianity, doesn’t mean that they have no contributions to make to Christians. Romans 2 comes to mind here. But as with all heroes one admires, one must watch the size of the pedestal on which one puts their heroes. Otherwise, authoritarianism takes hold and one reacts aggressively rather than thoughtfully to criticisms of those heroes.
Curt, what does one do when one gets up on the pedestal?
Depends, if one is already dead, then not much. Pedestals are the tools of those who build them.