Remember when anti-2kers put the “R” before 2k to assert that two-kingdom theology is radical? A recent Twitter thread keeps that complaint alive:
9/ and Radical 2K’ers who rail against anyone believing the Church has any social responsibility beyond preaching and sacraments, WesCal professors (oh yes, names: R. Scott Clark) and Southern Machen Warriors alike. It includes whole groups like Sovereign Nations, AOMin, …
— Bradly Mason (@AlsoACarpenter) April 30, 2019
The odd thing is the way critics will leap to connect dots between ideas and events (like the shooting in Poway that involved an OPC church member) and never read the sources closest to the congregation and its pastor. Here is a paragraph from the book on covenant theology that the pastor of that OPC congregation wrote:
The doctrine of the new covenant guards us against triumphalism. The new covenant shows us that the kingdom of God is no longer identified with any geopolitical nation on earth. This is particularly critical to grasp in American culture, where there is a tendency to confuse the kingdom of God with the United States. Americas, however, is not in covenant with God as a nation. It had no representative on Mount Sinai. The only nation in covenant with God is God’s new global nation, that is, his new covenant church. “But you are a chosen race,” says the apostle Peter, “a royal priesthood, a holy nation, a people for his own possession, that you may proclaim the excellencies of him who called you out of darkness into his marvelous light” (1 Pet 2:9). In the new covenant, the church is no longer limited to the physical descendants of Abraham but is made up of all the nations of the earth, people of every race, color, and language. While the old covenant was an era of driving the nations out of God’s holy land, the new covenant is an era of believers living side by side with unbelievers in patience and love. Today is the day of salvation, not judgment. God’s judgment is delayed until his return. (148)
That is not radical. It is moderate in the sense that it compels Christians to recognize that they live this side of glory in societies with non-Christians. It also reduces expectations for the Christian or moral capacities of a nation and its government. It is precisely an understanding of covenant theology and the gospel that contra Jemar Tisby and Timothy Cho is fundamentally at odds with white nationalism. There is nothing nationalist about it.
But the critics who for years have wailed and nashed teeth over 2k’s capitulation to secular society and “neutral” government are precisely those who wanted a nation with a Christian identity. Even those people who protest the United States’ long history of racism, want the nation to become Christian in the way it oversees and regulates race relations. Believe it or not, that understanding of church and state does not make a lot of room for non-Christians.
But 2k is radical. I get it.
5 thoughts on “Can Your Two Kingdom Theology Do This?”
Three cheers for public reason.
“You never let a serious crisis go to waste…”
Some things are just too important.
This is not a hot take, and that makes all the difference. http://www.reformation21.org/blog/2019/05/it-could-happen-among-us.php
LikeLiked by 1 person
M. Holst wrote a great article. Thanks for posting. Can someone explain to me why this incident is deserving of more outrage than the hundreds of Christians murdered in Sri Lanka last week or the hundreds of thousands of Christians murdered in Nigeria over the past decade? The Press and their lackies among in the American Protestant church are practically falling all over themselves to declare this incident the precursor to another Holocaust.