A 2007 estimate of evangelical leaders (read elites):
Since 1976, hundreds of evangelicals. . . have risen to positions of public influence. But they have not done so by chance. The rise of evangelicalism is the result of the efforts of a select group of leaders seeking to implement their vision of moral leadership. They have founded organizations, formed social networks, exercised what I call “convening power,” and drawn upon formal and informal positions of authority to advance the movement. Sociologist Randall Collins has argued that recognition and acclaim are bestowed upon leaders and ideas through structured, status-oriented networks. Over the last three decades, the legitimacy that has come to the evangelical movement has come through the political, corporate, and cultural leaders who were willing publicly associate with it. Evangelicalism, with its history of spanning denominational boundaries is well suited to help evangelicals build connections and important leaders and prestigious institutions. They have formed alliances with diverse groups, giving the movement additional cachet and power in surprising ways. Leaders are often at the vanguard of a movement, and this book shows how evangelicals endowed with public responsibility have been at the forefront of social change over the last thirty years. By building networks of powerful people, they have introduced evangelicalism into the higher circles of American life. The moral leadership they practice certainly grows out of their evangelical convictions, but it also reflects the privilege they enjoy and the power they wield. Indeed, their leadership is an extension of-not a departure from-the elite social worlds they inhabit. (Michael Lindsay, Faith in the Halls of Power, 11-12)
Were Bush-era evangelicals ever set up for a fall?
The lesson here is beware when sociologists praise your movement, that includes you Young, Restless, Reformed, you.
One thought on “When You Might Want a Mulligan”
Dopes the quote mean anything more than, people with influence & power have a lot of influence & power? It would be more interesting to explore the undoubted fact that increased numbers of evangelicals with apparent influence & power have had no effect on the ethos, morals, or values of the country at large. This is in contrast for example, the the influence of “Wesleyan” (broadly defined) evanglicalism around the turn of the 18th to 19th centuries.