Another way to supplement Chris Gordon’s post about the demise of confessionalism in the CRC and lessons for the PCA is to consider what happened to the OPC after the failure of union between the CRC and the OPC.
The merger that the OPC and CRC contemplated between 1956 and 1972 never took place but at roughly the same time that those negotiations died, the PCA was born and for the next twenty years became the chief player in ecclesiastical mergers-and-acquisitions. First the PCA acquired in 1982 the Reformed Presbyterian Church, Evangelical Synod (an earlier merger of revival-friendly Covenanters and dissident – read agreeable – Bible Presbyterians of the McIntire variety) and then the PCA almost in 1986 absorbed the OPC (a majority of Orthodox Presbyterians voted in favor but not by the two-thirds majority required for sending the plan to presbyteries for ratification). In the aftermath of that failed plan for Joining & Receiving, congregations in the OPC and PCA had the liberty to re-align if they chose. This was opening for a number of New Life churches (among them the Glenside congregation where Tim Keller learned the ways of New Life Presbyterianism) to join the PCA during the late 1980s.
Again, a piece of OPC history (self-promotion alert) that fills out Gordon’s observations:
In 1988 the effects of the OPC’s change of direction were still visible but not altogether clear. Again the church experienced a growth numerically, rising to 19,422 members but it also lost two more congregations to the PCA, one (New Life) in Philadelphia and one in Southern California. Only in 1989 did the OPC’s statistician start to notice these numerical changes as part of a “step backward.” That year was the peak of membership and congregational loss. The church’s total membership decreased by 3.5 percent to 18,689. [ed. no snickering] Meanwhile, five congregations transferred to the PCA, among them New Life in Escondido, California. This was the same year that the Assembly’s decisions about Bethel church took their toll. A majority of the Wheaton congregation (162 out of 301) left the OPC to form an independent congregation, which eventually affiliated with the Evangelical Presbyterian Church. In 1990 the “step backward” statistically lengthened. The OPC lost another 546 members and three congregations; among them New Life, Glenside, joined the PCA. Only by 1991 did the hemorrhaging stop and membership begin to rise again. In 1992 the OPC added 525 members and total membership increased to 18,767.
The movement of OPC congregations into the PCA was the occasion for a exchange between John M. Frame and Richard B. Gaffin, Jr. in New Horizons on realignment at the same time that statistics were revealing the consequences of congregational transfers. It was a telling exchange because it revealed an important aspect of Orthodox Presbyterianism that after the semi-centennial was beginning to reassert itself within the life of the communion and causing sufficient discomfort for others to look for another denominational home. That characteristic of Orthodox Presbyterianism was the Reformed doctrine of the church in which membership in particular communion was not a supplement to Christian identity but its embodiment. As Gaffin explained in this exchange, the OPC was not merely a denomination; “it is a church, a church that exists by divine warrant.” As such, he added, “Biblical presbyterianism has no place for loyalties torn between the denomination and the local congregation, or for greater loyalty to either one.” In contrast, Frame, who was then an associate pastor of the New Life congregation in Escondido that had realigned with the PCA, explained that the reason for transferring was to partner more effectively with other church planting efforts in southern California. Denominational affiliations for him were at best accidental, at worst sinful. Either way, he hoped that denominational “barriers” would become less important and that Orthodox Presbyterians would understand that transferring to the PCA was not a sign of disloyalty or contempt. The move was simply practical.
Clearly, Frame did not see the switch to the PCA as the serious risk that Gaffin said it was. Gaffin believed such transfers were dangerous because they nurtured a mind set that increased divisions in the church, not along lines of biblical witness, but according to personal preferences or styles of ministry. As such, Gaffin was expressing a doctrine of the church that had deep roots in American Presbyterianism reaching back to Old School Presbyterianism and even to the Old Side Presbyterians of the colonial era. Frame, in contrast, was more typical of a view of the church characteristic of New School and New Side Presbyterians, where the formal work of ministry was supplemental to the religious endeavors of all believers. In other words, whether Frame or Gaffin acknowledged the history of American Presbyterianism in their reflections, they spoke volumes about Orthodox Presbyterianism and how it emerged and developed in relation to its Presbyterian past. Among the many convictions for which the OPC had stood historically, the doctrine of the church as part of biblical teaching and necessary for faithful witness was one of the hallmarks of Orthodox Presbyterianism. During the 1970s and 1980s that ecclesial conviction had begun to wane if only because it was not producing the size and influence that some Orthodox Presbyterians desired. But as the OPC began to take stock of its past, it also recovered one of its most noticeable features. Furthermore, just as that commitment to biblical Presbyterianism had been a source of frustration to Bible Presbyterians in the 1930s, neo-evangelicals in the 1940s, and more generally to Orthodox Presbyterians like Edwin H. Rian who had hoped the OPC would turn out to be a conservative version of culturally established and respectable Presbyterianism, so in the late 1980s as the OPC recovered its doctrine of the church some felt compelled to look for better, friendlier, or less restrictive expressions of American Presbyterianism than the OPC. (Between the Times, 316-18)
In other words, the consequences of Reformed ecumenism from the 1970s and 1980s were having consequences for all of the players — the CRC, OPC, and PCA. Where Presbyterians went, their forms of association, and their understand of the church were factors in the witness they embraced.
11 thoughts on “How Orthodox Presbyterians became PCA”
I was a member of New Life OPC, La Mesa CA when they joined the PCA in the 2000s. Apparently New Life in Escondido the same a little earlier; that church has perhaps the largest share of WSCAL faculty as members.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Can one be old side and new school? New side, old school?
Ah, now that I read the quote I see NLPCAEsco mentioned
LikeLiked by 1 person
This is such timely and important stuff–upholding the Gordon piece. (Read-circling the overly strident Confessionalist Wagons)
Timely in light of the “Lent is Methodist” blog post Dr. Hart put forth several weeks ago.
Important because this post and the one right before this one make Dr. Hart feel good.
For a guy who has spent a career wailing against felt needs and experience, how (among other things) very boring if not barouche. I would have at the very least expected a 1920 model T (Orange City) over this truly spiral to the low levels of….. “Me thinks you are protesting too much!” Protest DGH, protest, and stay thirsty! You be you!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Barouche? Or do you mean a combination of Baroque and Gauche?
Interesting stuff. I may have to buy (another) the book. I’ve often wondered about Bethel – I’d heard that there had been a split some time in the recent past, but can never seem to find anyone who knows (or is willing to talk about) the details. I’ve also thought it odd that a fellow raised in that congregation left town to become a pastor at a major PCA congregation in a large Eastern Pennsylvania city, then returned to Wheaton to take the helm of a major evangelical college while joining an independent congregation across the street. From what I’ve experienced while visiting there over the years, Bethel now has an excellent pastor, a great expositor of scripture. There must be something else going on, a hidden under current that’s behind all of this that isn’t easy to uncover.
As someone thinking of how the Westminster Confession and Presbyterian ecclesiology conveys sharp, clear definiion, I wish folks would simply let us pursue this without (ahem!) taking pot shots at it and those who articulate such practise. In the UK we hear so much fuzzy, poorly defined waffle in politics and also the church; do folks think how refreshing it is for us to have clarity and the avoidance of ambiguity in Presbyterian practise?
Do people really think we are that gormless to seek ecumenical links with New Calvinists and evangelicals which leads more or less inevitably to the dilution and weakening of that doctrinal clarity which conservative Presbyterian practise thankfully provides?
LikeLiked by 2 people
PAH, it’s a free country but Old Side generally did not carry it that way.
DGH, I see a lot of continuity between Old Side/Old School and New Side/ New School. Is it then correct to say that the main difference was the historical context (1st GA vs 2nd GA) but that the “basic spirit” of Old Siders and Old Schoolers was continuous?
PAH, most of the Old Schoolers were pro-revival (at least those of Whitefield and Edwards). Old School was anti-Finney but never really challenged revivalism. It took Nevin to do that.
LikeLiked by 1 person